Archive for April, 2002

114 – Panic Room

Any movie that builds an entire plotline around one room in one house is just begging for trouble. I don’t care if that one room’s outfitted like Chuck E. Cheese’s restaurants; if you limit your setting, you’re asking for yawns. But that’s what Panic Room does. Sure, there’s a lot of action – such as it is – outside the room – but even what isn’t contained within the ultrathick walls of the safe place is contained within the relatively small house itself (or maybe just the ultrathick walls of the screenwriter’s mind).

The gist of the story is that Meg Altman (Jodie Foster), who’s recently been divorced from her husband, a very wealthy pharmaceutical dude, is buying this upscale brownstone in Manhattan for her and her generic kid (although not a cute generic kid; looks like they ran out of “cute” at Child Actors R Us and had to settle for not-so-cute-but-oh-so-spunky). Even though the fee is more than she’s willing to pay and even though it’s a little weird looking, our plucky heroine throws caution to the wind and buys the place. And immediately moves in – which, you homeowners know, happens with all the frequency of a loan getting approved quickly.

The place has this complicated security system – it doesn’t look all that large, frankly, but the system separates the house into zones, all “armed” at night. Sounds safe, right? When the house was being shown to Meg, she noticed that the master bedroom was smaller than it should be – surprise! There’s a hidden room! Oh, what fun! What’s it for, you ask? It’s explained to Meg that if someone breaks into the house, she can get to the room and call the police from the handy-dandy not-connected-to-the-main-line phone; even if the main line’s cut, you see, she can still call Officer Bob.

Now, I don’t know about you folks, if, while being shown a new place, I am told that the house has an awesome “safe room” in case someone breaks in – I’m getting the hell out of there. Wouldn’t that tell even the biggest dunce that there’s a crime problem in the area? I mean look – there’s a friggin’ security system! They’re saying that a) people will break in, b) the security system won’t do squat, c) you can’t call the cops from the main line because they’ll show up next week, so yay! We have this neato safe room for you.

So to begin with, the premise is mired in utter stupidity. In fact, I sit here dumbfounded by its stupidity.

Naturally, the first night Meg and her daughter Sarah are sleeping in the house, someone breaks in. Three burglars are there to recover something from the panic room’s vault, but of course they don’t expect anyone to be in the house. Okay, common mistake. One of them, Burnham (Forrest Whitaker), almost decides to call off the thing, since people are in there and he’s got this thing against hurting people, and all that. But don’t worry, he’s soon talked out of it by Junior (Jared Leto), the nominal head of this happy bunch, which also includes the unexpected Raoul (Dwight Yoakam – didn’t he used to have a music career, or something?).

Whoosh! Meg and the youngster rush to the panic room, where they proceed to panic.

A lot of contrivances abound. For one thing, Meg’s claustrophobic, so she has problems dealing. For another, Sarah is diabetic, a fact that plays an unfortunate major role in the movie. Can Meg save her child before the bad guys get to her? Oh, can she?

You know, just as an aside, I remember when Forrest Whitaker was just starting out in show biz. Remember Good Morning, Vietnam? That boy made some great career moves – Smoke was another. He’s a great supporting-role kinda guy. It’s just a crying shame this movie depends on him so heavily. He’s the only one – yes, only one – who turns in even a decent performance. And since he’s a bad guy, I should have been rooting against him, right? Ha! Guess again, Dr. Watson. I was hoping Burnham would escape.

Jodie Foster, on the other hand, gives one of the most constipated performances of a lifetime. Did she check out her contract before agreeing to this crap? This woman’s won OSCARS, for crying out loud! Geez, they couldn’t get Ann Archer to do this role? Or Christine Lahti? Or Kathleen Turner? Or anyone else whose career has slowed down a bit?

Eleven people, including me, were in the theater when I watched this movie. Eleven! It’s a new movie, too! And because there were 11, I tried my darndest not to laugh out loud at the moronic dialog, inept direction, and incompetent camerawork. Really. I tried hard. But failed. I mean, I didn’t want to embarrass myself, much as the actors onscreen were embarrassing themselves.

Oh, and to add more insult to the whole shebang, the director is the same guy who brought the creative Fight Club and Seven to the big screen. Talk about slumming! Did he owe someone a lot of money?

This turkey is rated unwatchable. The movie was somehow allowed to rise from somewhere in the murky bowels of Mother Earth to fester like a cold sore in the mouth of the American audience.

Panic Room: 1

, , , , ,

1 Comment

113 – Thirteen Ghosts

Traditionally, a remake of a horror movie is going to stink. Sure, this can be said about more than half of all remakes, regardless of genre, but it’s especially true with horror movies, because unless the new movie goes off in a completely new direction, the suspense and the fear factor have been eliminated.

This was somewhat true with House on Haunted Hill (1999), which was a remake of the 1958 film of the same name, and it’s even more true with this film, a remake of Roger Corman’s 1960 movie.

An eccentric rich dude (if he were poor, he’d just be weird) who loves collecting oddities bequeathes his house and all the goofy stuff in it to his unsuspecting nephew Arthur (Tony Shalhoub) and his family. The house is a gorgeous mansion, although it is stuffed with some truly gruesome antiquities. Oh, but the late Uncle Cyrus (whom Arthur met a couple of times, tops) certainly danced to a different drummer, so the weirdness quotient’s acceptable. His house is away from everything else – not a neighbor for miles, the lawyer tells them all – lending a supposedly eerie atmosphere to the murky, muddled script.

Arthur is joined by his lovely daughter Kathy (Shannon Elizabeth – you might remember her from being scantily clad in the American Pie movies), his morbid young son Bobby (Alec Roberts), and his son’s nanny Maggie (Rah Digga). The mother died in a fire, a fact that’s brought up more than once throughout the movie. It’s all about ghosts, you see, just in case you were misled by the film’s title. Ghosts and souls and fun, uplifting stuff like that.

At any rate, the family gets this house, but weird things happen even before Arthur signs the paperwork. For one thing, there’s the wacky dude named Rafkin (Matthew Lillard) who palled around with ol’ Uncle Cyrus (played by F. Murray Abraham – remember when he won an Oscar for Amadeus? Poor guy can’t catch a break now, generally playing heavies, but this is a new low for his career). Seems Rafkin knows more than a little about these weird goings on. So what’s it all about? There are thirteen ghosts, collected there by Uncle Cyrus, and there’s also a whole buncha money, safely stowed inside a whole horkin’ ton of traps.

But Arthur and his clan just want to get out of the house, which sealed itself shut as soon as possible. The ghosts don’t want them to leave, y’see, because they’re basically ghosts of Really Bad People (oh, and they can only be seen through use of these nifty special glasses). Naturally, the kids get lost, separated from their dad who must, with the dubious help of Rafkin, somehow locate them before they’re tortured and killed by the spirits. Or something like that.

This movie is about 95% screams – and no, that’s not a good thing, no matter how enamored you are of slasher films. The plot is simplistic and is largely unnecessary, given the massive budget for effects (I’m reluctant to call them ‘special’). There’s much shrieking, probably so designed to distract the viewer from the unending, undying crappiness of the film itself. Forget the acting – there is none. These people take every cliche from the Great Book of Horror Movies and overact their way to stupendous boredom. It’s a lesson in ennui, which is tough when you’re trying to make a horror movie. One fun pasttime for those watching the movie is to see how dumb and gullible the characters are. This is a time-honored tradition; ever sit down and watch a cheesy 70s horror movie, pointing out the utter stupidity of the Dumb Blonde who comes back to the cabin to find none of her friends around, then proceeds to take a shower – with the bathroom door open? Sure, we’ve all done that. That’s about all you can do with this waste of time, too. In the grand pantheon of horror movies, it’s pretty awful, albeit slightly better than that benchmark of Crappidom, Blair Witch Project II: Book of Shadows.

Thirteen Ghosts: 1

, , , ,

1 Comment

112 – Training Day

Denzel Washington won the Oscar for this role as a corrupt narcotics cop. That in itself is an unusual sentence – not the Oscar part, but the “corrupt” part, as Washington rarely plays bad guys. But his Alonzo is most certainly a bad guy, out on the streets not for the greater good but to further his own interests. Even so, while Alonzo’s not the most moral of characters, Washington makes him so multilayered that you almost root for him to persevere. Ethan Hawke plays rookie cop Jake Hoyt. Ok, he’s not a rookie cop, exactly; he’s been on the force for something like 14 months. But he wants to do bigger and better things, so he’s signed up for Alonzo’s elite narc squad.

Alonzo puts Hoyt through the paces – visiting snitches, shaking down people, doing the drugs they confiscate (or at least making Hoyt do them). Through it all, Alonzo seems mean and cynical, but also worldly and supremely intelligent. He’s not just some megalomaniacal renegade cop who’s king of his own world, or even some Johnny Law with a ‘tude. The viewer wonders what’s up Alonzo’s sleeve: Does he have plans for young Mr. Hoyt? Is he just playing with him? Or is he just completely nuts? You just plain never can tell with Washington’s portrayal, and that’s why he deserved the Oscar. Always keeping the audience guessing, Washington makes sure you don’t pigeonhole his character as purely evil.

The events that take place during the day (as the title suggests, all of the action is confined to one day’s work) imply that they’re all leading up to something – the audience just doesn’t know what. If Alonzo is bad and is looking out for himself, what kind of denoument can be expected? If he isn’t completely bad, is he going to say the day’s just been one long lesson for his newcomer?

The crisp script by David Ayer never lets up, relentlessly pounding the viewer with these and other questions. Moral ambiguity is a delicious plot device, but only if the script is well written. There’s hardly any lag in Training Day, so that if there were any plotholes the viewer would gloss over them quickly enough. The movie’s hard hitting, full of life and excitement, complete with plenty of twists. You can never get completely used to anything in the movie, because few things are as they seem.

The one exception to this is Hoyt himself. Maybe he’s supposed to be an Everyman; more likely he’s just a wide-eyed innocent being corrupted by the Big Bad Veteran. Hawke has the wide-eyed look down pretty good, which is a bit of a comedown from a guy who played a supercool dude in 1994′s Reality Bites. It’s the meatiest role Hawke’s had, and he seriously flubs it. But since he’s playing opposite Washington, and since this is Washington’s movie, Hawke’s inadequacies are easily overlooked, as well they should be. Having said that, there’s no way Hawke should have been nominated for an Oscar, as he was. What were people thinking? That Washington was as good as he was because he had Hawke to play off? Hardly. It’s an ineffectual performance; Edward Norton would have been a far better choice – and he could have walked home with that Oscar, too.

Training Day: 7.5

, ,

1 Comment