Archive for June, 2003
140 – The Recruit
There are two kinds of stupid movies: the ones that are loud and stupid, with their explosions masking their inherent dopiness, and the ones that are quiet and stupid, whose glaring improbabilities in the plot are revealed with every daring swoop their hero makes.
Guess which one this is.
Movies that are loud and stupid serve a purpose; that is, as escapist fare. These movies allow us to be distracted by the cool special effects, and plot is a distant second priority. The focus is on Our Hero and how he will Save the Day. But the quiet ones, oh, their stupidity is glaring, like a boil that desperately needs lancing.
The Recruit has a nifty premise. James Clayton (Colin Farrell) is recruited to become a CIA agent by Walter Burke (Al Pacino). Burke tells Clayton and the other recruits several times at a super-duper-secret facility known as The Farm that nothing is as it appears, and they should trust no one. Sadly, our intrepid hero doesn’t remember this from scene to scene. James, naturally, falls for a fellow recruit, Layla (Bridget Moynahan), and it’s not long before Burke uses her to “test” James.
There are some wrinkles afoot. For one thing, James lost his dad years ago in a mysterious helicopter accident. Was the elder Clayton working for the CIA? He’s not sure. By the time this movie’s over, you might not be too sure, either, and unfortunately, you won’t care.
If a movie is highly dependent on plot twists and turns, it must make those twists plausible. Overanalyzing a movie is never a good thing, because doing so takes all the fun out of watching them in the first place. This is why it’s perfectly okay for an action movie to be implausible – we don’t need it to be so for us to enjoy it.
But The Recruit must be plausible for it to be enjoyable, and there were several moments during the movie where the “oh, come ON” quotient was very high. “Oh, come ON!” I cried to the dog next to me. “Why would he do that?” or “Oh, come ON! Man, James is an idiot for not figuring this out!”
You see, if I can be several steps ahead of the hero plotwise, that’s not a good thing. It means that the screenwriters (in this case, Roger Towne and Kurt Wimmer) were lazy and couldn’t be bothered with a story that made sense. And to top it off, the hook of “is it real or is it a fake?” simply isn’t effective when it’s overplayed. The audience doesn’t like it when you tell them things aren’t as they seem and then follow it up by making everything not what it seems. We need something to hang on to.
Another thing that irked me a little bit was how dumb some of the characters were. This would be fine if the characters were supposed to be bumbling oafs, but these were allegedly CIA recruits! They’re awfully obtuse for people who should be able to think themselves out of situations.
As for the acting, well; this is the first time in a while I can remember Al Pacino being outhammed. Pacino runs hot in cold; sometimes he’s Acting Al, getting deep into his character, and other times he’s Crazy Al, simply overacting. The latter wins in this case, but Farrell easily outhams him. Every emotion is overdone to the point where we as an audience find it tough to root for him. Then again, I’m sure there are many out there who don’t give a darn how well Farrell acts. But if it’s a pretty boy you’re looking for, let’s try to keep them contained to pretty boy movies, not supposedly slick thrillers.
The Recruit is quite long (155 minutes), and might have been improved if it had been shortened by about an hour. It’s overblown, overdone, and a waste of talent and a good idea.
The Recruit: **
139 – Star Trek: Nemesis
Posted by frothy in Star Trek: Nemesis on June 12, 2003
It’s the tenth cinematic voyage of the Enterprise, the fourth with the Next Generation crew, even though TNG has been off the air for years. Picard, Riker, and the gang are in a happy mood, as Riker and Troi have just been married.
Ah, but first they answer a strange positronic signal – much like that emanated by Data – on a distant planet. They find a prototype of Data, whom he calls his “brother” and who is known as B4. Quelle apropros!
And that’s not all, of course. Before Troi and Riker can go on their honeymoon, the ship is ordered to the Romulan system. Seems their old foes want to make nice, since they’ve had a couple of coups lately. The Enterprise is sent as a representative of the Federation, ambassadors of good.
When they get there, they’re in for a surprise, of course. The new leader of the Romulans seems to have an interesting relationship to Picard. Is he for real? Is he a good guy looking to help his people, or is he an evil despot, bent on destroying all?
Compared with other films in the TNG series, this one is one of the weaker entries. This doesn’t mean it’s not entertaining in spots, and the cast isn’t just going through the motions. But the plot is weak, even if the special effects aren’t. I liked this movie better than some of the old-school Star Trek films, like the first, third, and fifth ones, but not as much as First Contact and Generations from the new set.
The characters remain believable and are faithful to the canon. Picard is a quick-thinking leader who is never unwilling to allow others the chance to run things – as opposed to Kirk, who let everyone know who was in charge at all times. Picard, much better at solving problems and delegating authority, is the better leader by far.
I haven’t yet checked to see if there will be an eleventh Star Trek film, but a few things make me wonder. First, Riker and Troi, newly married, leave the Enterprise after this mission is completed. Second, another crew member – and of course, I won’t say who – does not survive.
Star Trek: Nemesis: **1/2
138 – The Matrix: Reloaded
Posted by frothy in Matrix: Reloaded on June 12, 2003
If you’ve seen The Matrix (1999), then you’ll appreciate this movie. If you haven’t, you’re going to be lost. There’s a lot in here that depends on the plot of the original. So please, go see the original before seeing this sequel.
The Matrix itself is basically everything you see – the entire planet, the movie says, is controlled by machines. Only a select few know this, and their mission in life is to free the minds of others who are enslaved by the Matrix, leading them to the city of Zion, located about the Earth’s core.
One of the chief rebels is Morpheus, played by Lawrence Fishburne. Morpheus, in the original movie, thinks he’s stumbled upon The One, the person who can save Zion and the rest of humanity from the Matrix. That would be Neo, played by Keanu Reeves.
As the second movie opens, the machines have discovered Zion and are tunnelling to it. It’s only a matter of time before they tunnel through and kill all those inside. But rather than fortify the defenses of the city, Morpheus believes in the prophecy of The One. He defies the orders of the city’s elders and brings Neo back to the surface (that is, the Matrix) so that he can meet with the wise Oracle.
Are you confused yet? There are many themes here, some of which are philosophical and metaphysical in nature. One can view this movie on two fronts: as a gritty action movie or as a thought-provoking drama.
Reloaded is replete with some eye-opening special effects, many of which were computer generated. In one scene, Neo combats the evil Agent Smith. Oh, but not just one Agent Smith – 100 of them at once. It’s not like those cheesy kung fu movies where the villains take turns beating up on Bruce Lee; in this one, they attack simultaneously. Another scene features a fight atop a tractor-trailer on a crowded freeway.
It’s tough to convey all of the complexities of the plot. In fact, this is a movie that people – like the original – will need to watch multiple times just to catch all of the plot twists. What does it all mean? And even more important, what’s it all leading to? This is the second movie of the series, with the third one coming out in November this year.
Rather than delve into the intricacies of the storyline, let me give you some pros and cons. If you’re a fan of the series, you’re going to go no matter what I say, and if you thought the first one was a waste or not for you anyway, you won’t be going to this one.
Let’s look at the acting. It’s wooden. Keanu Reeves was born to play this role, as it requires little to no emoting. Plus, he looks cool in shades and a trenchcoat. I’ll admit it, he looks very good, and in the non-computer-generated fight scenes, he looks somewhat plausible.
His love interest, the mysterious Trinity, is played by Carrie-Anne Moss. Another one who simply cannot act, so she fits right in. Now, this may be a simple matter of personal tastes, but she’s astoundingly unattractive. She’s Neo’s love interest, and yet the two of them have absolutely no chemistry. It’s like watching a totem pole and a mop mate.
Eew. Even Fishburne didn’t come off perfectly. Some of his lines sound like they came off a cereal box top. Sure, that’s no fault of Larry, but his delivery had the resonance of a funeral dirge. He’s a very commanding figure, though, and he does deliver a solid performance as Morpheus.
Okay, so maybe the acting isn’t wonderful. Who cares, right? You don’t watch these movies for the emoting. Let’s see some tail being kicked!
The action sequences are very good, although not quite as overwhelming as those in the original. There are some additions – Agent Smith can replicate, and Neo can now fly. The flying thing is key, but quite frankly he just looks like Superman with a different color cape. Even so, the sequences themselves are good. The problem is that sometimes they seemed to be thrown into the movie for no real reason other than to have an action scene. Another problem is that these scenes seemed to come right from a Nintendo game. You know, the type where you hit something like up and right and the B button to do a freaky Street Fighter move on someone? Plus several times in each scene, the action is paused so that the audience can get the full effect, since everyone’s moving so quickly.
Another big difference between this movie and the original is that although the original was pretty philosophical itself, it expressed philosophical themes with tangible objects, such as the pills and the spoon. You see? We normal folk can grasp those concepts when the themes are expressed in that manner. But the second film relies more on abstract concepts, and that might lose people who don’t have doctorates in Jungian theories.
The ending is a little bit of a downer, but since we know it’s leading up to the third film, we shouldn’t feel particularly let down. Yes, it’s “to be continued,” but this movie more than stands on its own. Think of it more as an episode.
The Matrix: Reloaded: ***





People Had This to Say