Archive for May, 2004
165 – The Day after Tomorrow
Posted by frothy in Day after Tomorrow on May 31, 2004
The Day after Tomorrow is an appropriate title, really. It’s the kind of movie you always want to watch the day after tomorrow, no matter what the day is.
Okay, cheap joke. Always a good way to start a review, even if it’s a joke that’ll show up in most lukewarm reviews. Tornados in Los Angeles! A tidal wave in New York! Superduperquick frost!! Run! Get the kids, go to the basement! No, wait, it’ll flood there. Go to the top floor! No, wait, the tornado will get you. Ahhh! Die!
Seems that when Hollywood wants you to get killed, well then by gum you get killed, logic be damned. See, the polar ice caps are melting (perhaps you’ve read about this somewhere). According to paleoclimatologist Jack Hall (Dennis Quaid), the fresh water from the melted caps was interfering with the salt water of the oceans (who knew?), causing desalinization, which in turn apparently causes every natural disaster known the man, even hurricanes that appear over land (hint: they usually appear over water).
Hall’s model claims this’ll all happen over the next 100, 1000 years (he’s not sure, of course), but during a conference in New Delhi the vice president of the United States heckles him from the audience. As in most disaster movies, this is foreshadowing; as soon as the mess happens (first in L.A., for a change), Jack tries to warn the veep about What Might Happen, and he’s ignored. (“He tried to tell them… but they wouldn’t listen!”) It’s up to Jack to save the day!
At the same time, Jack’s son Sam (Jake Gyllenhaal) is attending some kind of smart-kid trivia contest in New York. When the tidal wave hits the city, Sam and his gang (including the One Nerd in his group, the Girl of Sam’s Dreams; and the Cad Who Might Steal Her Away from Sam) are pretty much stranded. At first, they attempt to get back to home to Washington, but a last-second phone call to Jack convinces Sam to stick it out in the New York Public Library.
The dichotomy between father and son isn’t subtle. Sam’s a bit of a rebel, having received a failing grade in a class for not showing his work, and Jack’s always rebelling against his bosses at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. At the library, Sam decides to walk across the giant ice floe that’s developed in Manhattan to a Russian tanker that’s somehow made its way into town. (Don’t ask.)
Back in D.C., Jack decides to fulfill a promise he’d made to his son (look! More foreshadowing!) and trek to New York to get his son. There are two instances of “No! I can’t let you go alone!” as Jack’s comrades in science and Sam’s friends help out.
At any rate, Jack’s eventually called in to brief the president and the Joint Chiefs. Of course, why wouldn’t he be? He’s obviously the only scientist in the world who said global warming would be the end of us all. During the briefing, he outlines the bad news, that in about 7-10 days the face of the globe would be changed forever. Jack’s a real downer, isn’t he? Someone in the room asks him what his plan is, which is funny – I thought that was THEIR job. But that’s what they do in these disaster movies; they ask the scientist what he thinks should be done, and then they ignore him. But this time, they don’t. Probably because by that time New York was 100 feet under water and snow, and Los Angeles was demolished by three twisters. So what’s Jack’s plan? Evacuation. Get this – he draws a line on a map, cutting the United States in half widthwise. All of the states below the line should be evacuated; those above it, Jack says, are already lost. It’s too late to save him, he claims. The southern states should go to Mexico.
Bearing in mind that the science in this movie is already highly suspect, one must also realize that emigrating to Mexico is a pretty dumb idea. Why there? If the frosty badness is going to hit, say, Texas, why would it stop at the Rio Grande? The entire southwest U.S. seemed to be as safe as Mexico, and yet the president orders everyone to go there (which led to some laughter in the audience – U.S. citizens charging en masse across to border TO Mexico?). Only after the U.S. forgives a ton of third-world debt are we allowed to overrun Mexico. Which only seems fair. (Note to third-world countries! Hope for a massive disaster to befall us so your debt will be forgiven!)
(As an aside, here’s a drinking game for you to try when this comes out on video. Every time someone says, “My God!” or some variant, chug some vodka.)
The special effects weren’t bad, but they weren’t nearly as convincing as they should have been, given that there was no real character development, a simple plot, and an atmosphere that failed to get me to care about any of the participants (although it did try). The tornados looked real, and so did the tidal wave (to an extent), but the timberwolves that fortuitously show up about halfway through didn’t look at all real – perhaps because they weren’t. They were computer generated.
The entire tone of the movie was off a little, too. Imagine this in real life. Tens of millions of people are going to die. Sure, you’d be concerned about your own skin, but you wouldn’t likely forget that this was going to affect so many people. This movie, however, makes the imminent deaths of all of the offscreen people nothing more than background noise. There’s obvious mass bloodshed here, but no one seems to bat an eye.
There are also superfluous characters and story threads, which is fine if you’re in the middle of a four-night blockbuster miniseries. It’s not fine when you have to cram everything into two hours or so. Shedding some characters would have helped immensely.
Through it all, Dennis Quaid as Jack is very strong, perhaps the best work he’s done in years. He didn’t have much to work with, but I think he did a great, soulful performance. (I say “soulful” because I don’t think the director has one, and the performances of most of the cast leads me to doubt theirs as well.) Gyllenhaal is his equal as Sam, perhaps making up for his awful performance in October Sky. But most of the cast is just there, taking up space. One other notable mention, though; Ian Holm as Dr. Rapson, the scientist in Scotland who alerts Jack to the impending doom is outstanding, leagues better than the material.
One of the aspects of a disaster film that make it satisfying to moviegoers is that it has a palatable ending. Your ship sank? Well, at least some people survived and can simply pick up the pieces of their broken life, or at least hum the melody to a sad country song. But not the ostensible survivors of this movie, no. See, these natural disasters are supposedly the harbingers of another ice age. Yeah, you got it. They have to deal with this crap for 10,000 years.
The Day after Tomorrow is mediocre, with poor plotting, vacant characterizations, and mostly crummy special effects. It has some unintentionally hilarious moments, but overall it’s a waste of time. Still, if you must see it, please see it on the big screen.
The Day after Tomorrow: **
164 – The Cooler
Bernie Lootz (William H. Macy), as his name might imply, is a loser. A hapless, hopeless sad sack. Bernie’s job at the Shangri-La casino is to impart bad luck on gamblers who are enjoying good luck. It seems pretty easy, doesn’t it? Guy gets on a run at the craps table. Bernie stands next to him, maybe plays once, and suddenly the guy craps out. Saves the casino a lot of money, making a happy camper out of Shelly Kaplow (Alec Baldwin).
But Bernie’s had enough of the casino life, and he’s leaving in a week. But do you seriously think Shelly’s going to let him walk out? Bernie’s the best “cooler” the casino has, maybe the best ever. Shelly needs Bernie to help keep down the amount paid out to customers. So Shelly asks barmaid Natalie (Maria Bello) to look after Bernie, to make him feel good, to pick up his spirits so he doesn’t leave the Shangri-La.
It’s the best-laid plan of a rat, in this case. Predictably, Natalie falls for Bernie. Oh, hell hath no fury like a corrupt casino owner scorned, and Shelly plots his revenge in order to protect his investment. Oh, and while fending off the “new age” ideas of Larry Sokolov (Ron Livingston of Office Space), who’s brought in by Shelly financial backers to bring the casino into the modern era.
Whenever I see William H. Macy in a movie, I know for absolute certain that he’s going to turn in a perfect, nuanced performance. Even in bad movies, he stands out as a true professional. But his is not the only strong portrayal here. Baldwin, who received an Oscar nomination, is aces as the vicious, conflicted, but never out-of-control Shelly. Even when the situation looks like Shelly has no idea what to do, Shelly himself looks like he has all of the answers. Almost as good as Baldwin is Bello, a Tea Leoni lookalike, but with talent. Hers is a fantastic performance; she really held her own against Macy and Baldwin.
The movie is fairly well paced, without much lag, and the storyline moves along amiably; there are no extraneous storylines (save, perhaps, for a bit with Paul Sorvino as an aging lounge singer). The tone is dark and moody, although it’s splattered with flecks of hope throughout. Hope, you see, is the underlying theme: hope that Bernie can escape Shelly, hope that Bernie can be with Natalie.
The Cooler: ***
163 – Underworld
Posted by frothy in Underworld on May 1, 2004
It’s the oldest war of them all. No, not Democrats versus Republicans, or politicans versus the truth. It’s vampires versus werewolves (or Lycans, if you prefer), Evil versus evil. Or good evil versus bad evil.
Selene (Kate Beckinsale) is a beautiful vampire warrior who comes across a human named Michael (Scott Speedman), who’s been marked by the werewolves. Why Michael? Are the Lycans planning to use him in their endless battle with the vampires? Will Michael fall for the lovely, the talented Selene? Will Selene get to kick some werewolf butt? Yes, like sand through the hourglass of time in a bottle, these are the burning questions that are thankfully answered within the first twenty minutes or so.
The film is very similar to The Crow in style (and in a nod to the earlier film, Speedman’s character is named Michael Corvin; the lead character in The Crow: City of Angels was named Ashe Corven); it’s dark, noirish dark, foreboding dark, bad-guy dark, you name it. See, there’s dark, and then there’s dark dark. This is the latter. Now, the original Crow movie was wildly stylish, and Underworld carries that torch a little bit further. Not only does style triumph over substance, it body slams it to death and then dances on its grave. In other words, don’t look too closely at the plot, which doesn’t always hold up to close scrutiny. But that’s not likely, since the film’s so dark (did I mention that).
As with most comic-book-atmosphere tales, this one is full of Pretty People. Even vampires and werewolves gotta look good, you know, what with the extra grooming and tooth filing and all. At any rate, there’s nary an Ugly Person in sight. Even the despicable ones are Pretty People.
As Selene, Kate Beckinsale is very good, appropriately slinky and pliant. Beckinsale’s not known for taking on tough roles such as this – you usually see her in upper-crust films such as Emma and Cold Comfort Farm. But she acquits herself very well, so much so that there’s a sequel planned for 2005.
Her primary foil is Shane Brolly as Kraven, the leader of the vampires. Brolly snarls a lot, showing off what have to be more than the usual 32 teeth in the process. Brolly didn’t have much in the way of facial expressions here, just you’re basic “I’m mad!” and “I’m madder!” looks.
Underworld is agreeably well done, with a believable romance between Speedman and Beckinsale shunted to the background. This is about werewolves versus vampires, with men in the background, clueless as always, so the romance played out well on a subtle level.
Underworld: **1/2





People Had This to Say