Archive for July, 2005

215 – Million Dollar Baby

Hilary Swank plays Maggie Fitzgerald, a gutsy bundle of spit and verve who wants more than anything in the entire known universe to be a boxing champeen. So she takes her novice skill level to Frankie Dunn (Clint Eastwood), notable trainer of he-man boxers. Noting that Maggie’s not really male, Frankie treats her with a lot of disdain and disrespect, but grudgingly – with the help of his canny janitor/man-at-arms, Scrap (Morgan Freeman) agrees to train Maggie. At least until she can find a manager. Which she never does.

Swank again gets the Oscar nod (she also won for Boys Don’t Cry), but this isn’t her show at all – it’s that of the two old codgers, Eastwood and Freeman. Freeman’s excellence finally gets the level of recognition it deserves, as he won an Oscar, too, and Eastwood won for Best Director.The first three-quarters of the movie is pretty standard little-punk-against-all-the-odds fare, kind of a step or two above The Karate Kid, but along the same lines. Scrap and Frankie impart wisdom both practical and metaphysical to Maggie, who nods and flashes the largest set of teeth this side of a sabre-toothed tiger. Seriously, Hilary should look into getting those things capped or chisled down, or something.

Swank’s job is to look innocent and deserving, but still appear skillful and eager to learn more. Eastwood and Freeman just need to look smart and worldly, not to mention world-weary. All succeed in these broad characterizations.The final quarter of the movie, though, takes us on a sharp left turn away from the norm. I won’t give away the plot turn – it’s not a twist, just a turn – but it quickly moves the tone of the movie from inspirtational to sappy, from Rocky to Lifetime cable movies. As the audience, we’re supposed to feel for Maggie, no matter what happens, and that almost works against things here; Maggie Fitzgerald is shown as a saint, quite frankly. Everything she does seems to be right, or at least Well Intentioned, and most people on the planet aren’t quite that ethereal.

Still, it’s tough not to root for the little dickens. Maggie’s fiesty and is determined to succeed; no small feat, considering she’s scrawny even after a couple years of self-training. She’s motivated by having been told how much of a loser she is throughout her life (she’s 31 when the movie begins); if she’s unsuccessful as a fighter, she has nothing else to do, nowhere else to go. Presumably, anyway. She’s waitressing, after all, and does have a job when she begins training with Frankie, so she’s really not as bad off as she wants to appear.

The chemistry between the toothy Swank and the toothless Eastwood should have been fantastic – Oscar winners both, of course – but for me their verbal interplay fell flat. I felt like I was watching two people do a cold reading. On the other hand, old pros Eastwood and Freeman played off each other perfectly, for dramatic and comedic effects. Their scenes together – and one gets the impression that Freeman’s Scrap Iron wasn’t as huge a character in the original version of the script – were flawless and highly enjoyable to watch, sort of like seeing a married couple interact.

As with most athletics-related movies, Million Dollar Baby will try to manipulate you, and it’s fairly successful in that arena. However, the final reel of the movie just didn’t completely work for me, seeming more like a disease-of-the-week teleplay than an Academy Award-winning movie.

Million Dollar Baby: **1/2 

, , ,

No Comments

214 – The Aviator

Martin Scorcese’s lengthy homage to Howard Hughes is alternately gripping and aloof and unfortunately is forced to rely far too much on the dubious acting talents of its lead, Leonardo DiCaprio. As Hughes, the perpetually cherubic DiCaprio simply doesn’t have enough panache for the role, and the sometimes-garish makeup that’s intended to show Hughes’s aging merely accentuates DiCaprio’s anachronistic performance.

The movie spans a few decades in Hughes’s; heyday, from the 1920s to the 1940s, from his beginnings as producer/director of Hell’s Angels to his appearance before a Senate investigatorial committe. Hughes fights with everyone – Hollywood censors, the starlets he dated, his employees, the U.S. government, and rival airline tycoons, sometimes to the benefit of Hughes’s myriad business interests, and more often to their debit. The film largely deals with Hughes’s involvement in films and in the airline business, choosing to gloss over or ignore entirely his casinos in Las Vegas and the years leading up to his death in 1976.

At the crux of things, though, are Hughes the Film Producer and Hughes the Aviation Pioneer. From his long-delayed Hell’s Angels – which made him a national star – to his mammary-obsessed The Outlaw, The Aviator shows how single-minded Hughes was in his relentless pursuit of the Perfect Movie. Because he was independently wealthy and could lean on his own funds to keep production moving, Hughes worked outside the traditional Hollywood studio system, shaping Hollywood to fit his own ideas and methods. Not everything worked – and not every idea was well received – but Hughes remained a man unwilling to compromise his principles; some might call this “stubbornness.”

Juxtaposed with Hughes’s film travails is his constant drive to improve aviation, from the purchase of what would become TWA to the innovative behemoth Spruce Goose, which unfortunately flew a distance of one mile exactly one time. Hughes is shown as a notorious perfectionist, personally inspecting each new aircraft to see that it met his (unspecified) standards.

At 170 minutes long, The Aviator manages to cram in many useful and interesting tidbits about Hughes’s life and times, and even though certain aspects of his personality were omitted (such as his alleged aversion to African Americans), one doesn’t get the sense that something’s missing. This is a credit to the screenwriter, John Logan, although the runtime didn’t hurt.

As is usually the case with DiCaprio movies, the biggest liability in the movie was Leonard DiCaprio himself. As Hughes gets older in the movie, poor Leo looks exactly the same – and worse, acts exactly the same. Even when he’s not laden with makeup, DiCaprio looks like he’s about 12 years old and facing the real world for the first time. In The Aviator, he has the gravitas of an empty suit, never appearing to be more than, perhaps, the son of Howard Hughes. DiCaprio isn’t terrible in the movie, he’s just not terribly believable.

His supporting cast is pretty good, though, especially John C. Reilly as his number-two guy and all-around abuse receiver, Kate Beckinsale as Ava Gardner, and Alec Baldwin as Juan Trippe, the head of Hughes’s rival in air, Pan Am. When you have strong professional performances like the work these people turned in, the movie can suffer an underwhelming lead. Unfortunately, one of the key supporting roles wasn’t quite as fulfilling as it should have been – that of Katharine Hepburn, played quirkily by Cate Blanchett. Blanchett adopted Hepburn’s idiosyncrasies and personality tics as well as her odd, off-putting stuttering vocal delivery. Now, I’m not saying the real Katharine Hepburn wasn’t exactly as Blanchett portrayed her, but her mannerisms were so over the top that they were distracting and annoying. Blanchett won an Oscar for her performance; I believe a Razzie would have been more suitable.

The movie’s not much more than an interesting glimpse at a long-dead icon until it reaches the Senate hearings chaired by Senator Brewster (Alan Alda, who also garnered an Oscar nomination). Here especially, Hughes’s strength really shows through, although a present-day viewer might wonder how much of the hearings proceeded exactly as depicted in this movie. Alda, by the way, is fine – although I kept seeing those usual Alda mannerisms, which made me think of Hawkeye Pierce instead of a bad-guy politico.

Overall, The Aviator isn’t quite the epic it wanted to be, and although it’s well paced and benefits from fine supporting performances, it does suffer from an unworthy lead performance.

The Aviator: **1/2

, , , , , , , ,

No Comments