Archive for January, 2007

302 – Notes on a Scandal

About two-thirds of the way through Notes on a Scandal, one of the characters appears to go completely berserk with no provocation at all. Just so nice one minute and then BAM! completely loony the next. At first I thought this was a strange lapse on the part of Patrick Marber, the screenwriter; why have someone go around the bend without giving some sort of cause?

But then in the final third of the movie, it all falls into place. And when one does learn what the impetus is behind the seemingly unwarranted outburst, the logical plot points do align, and all is more or less aright with the world. And the way that the apparently loose strand was tied up (although not too neatly) quickly restored my faith in the film.

The stentorial Dame Judi Dench plays Barbara Covett, a self-described battle-axe of a teacher at a London high school, who befriends the school’s new art teacher, Sheba Hart (Cate Blanchett), a willowy tree branch of a woman who appears to be much more style than substance. During an altercation between students, Barbara saves Sheba with some quick thinking and impromptu discipline, and the two become fast friends. Both teachers are outsiders among their coworkers: Barbara the tough-minded contrarian and Sheba the tall, almost flighty blonde, and soon they’re enjoying lunches together and lunches and drinks after work. You know, good bonding.

Until, of course, Barbara learns that Sheba’s been having an affair with one of her underage students. But rather than turn Sheba in to the school authorities, Barbara instead decides to use the information to her advantage, eliciting a promise from Sheba to call off the affair immediately and return (metaphorically) to the loving arms of her older husband, Richard (Bill Nighy, lately seen with appendages on his face in the Pirates of the Caribbean movie), and her two young children. Barbara’s intentions seem pure – why involve the school and police when the two friends can work it out on their own? After all, that’s what friends are for.

But then Stuff Happens, the insane behavior to which I alluded in my first paragraph. And that causes a sea change in the way the friends view each other. Who is doing the right thing for whom, exactly? Is Barbara betraying Sheba’s confidence? Is Sheba half as bad as we’ve seen her made out to be? And a chain of events is set into motion that destroys people’s lives but falls just short of being a bona fide tragedy, since no one has the good grace to die of shame.

Dench is beyond superb. I’m so used to seeing her in regal, all-knowing roles that it’s refreshing to see her as a more vulnerable – and darker – character, allowing her to really plumb its depths. Barbara, who narrates, can be a cold, scheming bitch with a real axe to grind but also the kindest, empathic woman in the room. Well, for the right people, the kind of people she wants to spend the rest of her life with, perhaps. And Blanchett has never looked better, lighting up the screen with her bewitching, haunting eyes; it’s easy to see why her students think Sheba’s so wonderful. Heck, even the male teachers want to knock boots with Mrs. Hart.

As the movie races to its denouement, one’s never sure for whom one should be rooting, which to my mind is a hallmark of well-made thrillers. There aren’t really any winners in this one, just shattered dreams and lost opportunities. Huge kudos to the pitch-perfect cast and the artful direction of Richard Eyre, who directed Dench in Iris (2000).

***1/2
Technorati Tags:

, , ,

No Comments

301 – The Illusionist

When the young magician Eisenheim attempts to run away with his true love, the princess Sophie, the imposing wall of class divisions rises between them, and the star-cross’d lovers are separated. Years later, Eisenheim (Edward Norton) has risen to be the most popular – and mysterious – illusionist in Vienna, and Sophie (Jessica Biel) is betrothed to Crown Prince Leopold (Rufus Sewell), a tyrant-in-training who has designs on his father’s throne as Emperor.

Leopold grows increasingly uneasy about Eisenheim, whose relationship to Sophie is unknown to the Crown Prince, believing that the magician is committing fraud or claiming to possess supernatural powers. What truly irks the prince, though, is that Eisenheim manages to upstage him at the Prince’s own castle with a magical display that enchants his audience of the social elite. And so Leopold orders Chief Inspector Uhl (Paul Giamatti) to investigate the illusionist closely to determine his secrets.

Eisenheim performs some truly astounding tricks, including growing an orange tree before the unbelieving eyes of the audience and transporting a handkerchief from a closed box in the audience to the claws of small doves on the stage. But after a truly unfortunate turn of events, his show becomes quite minimalist in scope: The Illusionist merely sits on the stage and conjures – yes, conjures – speaking, reacting ghosts to wow and astound the audience, while Eisenheim mopes about distractedly. What has happened to put him in this state cannot be explained here, unfortunately. But when Eisenheim’s performances go a little too far for the Crown Prince’s liking, Leopold orders Uhl to arrest the magician.

But this is no mere telling of unrequited love followed by the mysteries of a magician. The placid Eisenheim desperately misses his long-lost love, and when he sees her in the company of the overbearing boor Prince Leopold, he uses all of the magic at his disposal to free the beautiful Sophie from the Crown Prince. How this is ultimately accomplished constitutes the great twist in The Illusionist.

Norton is simply – to use a pun shamefully – spellbinding as Eisenheim, a man who uses a paucity of words, every motion calculated well in advance, every emotion kept in check, doled out in spring-loaded moments of unbridled passion. Eisenstein, in the capable hands of Norton, is a romantic, a cipher, an unknowable hero. It’s a shame the movie was released during a year in which many other wonderful performances evolved on the screen, because Norton – twice nominated for Academy awards – turns in a performance that rivals those of his more-lauded roles.

Surprisingly, Biel is pretty good – and, of course, devastatingly sexy – as the aristocrat trapped in a loveless marriage who finally finds someone worth living for and with. Of course, there’s not much to be surprised about, since I haven’t seen her in much, just Ulee’s Gold, when she was a kid, and the Texas Chainsaw Massacre remake. Still, she’s hot, and it’s rare that a gorgeous actress can actually show emotional range. It’s a real treat, too, to watch Giamatti, who’s well cast as the intrepid inspector, a role with more than a passing acquaintance with Claude Rains’ Captain Renault of Casablanca, a man not above petty bribery and graft but with his own system of morals.

A lush, dark mystery, The Illusionist relies heavily on the splendid performances of its three youthful leads to weave wonderful threads of mystery, romance, and intrigue.

***1/2

Technorati Tags:

, ,

1 Comment

Oscars 2007

Have you heard that the Oscar noms are out? I think there was something about it in the news recently.

Anyway. Do you like to pick things randomly? Boy, are you in luck! I began a group on Oscar.com; you pick the winners and sit back and relax. Pretty simple.

Oh, and I can hear you guys now: “I haven’t seen ANY of these!” I don’t care! You know, every year someone wins who no one expected to win – the so-called experts are only sometimes right. So it’s a crap shoot of sorts. You can pick whomever and still have a great shot at winning. Plus if you do this group, you’re automatically entered into some kind of sweepstakes.

Log on to OSCAR.com, make your predictions, then join your group
using the information below:

URL: http://predict.oscar.go.com/predict/frontpage

Group Name: Unsightly Blemishes
Group Password: dantehicks

Then tune in Sunday February 25, 2007 at 5PM PT/8PM ET to see if your predictions come true!

No Comments

300 – Little Miss Sunshine

You know, a decade or so ago, I had a 1977 Volkswagen minibus. Had a couple hundred thousand miles on it and was a tough drive if one wasn’t used to manual transmissions, but it looked cool in a somewhat-ironic way and was, of course, a viable means of conveyance. You’ll find almost the same exact VW in Little Miss Sunshine, with the same wacky orange exterior and weird off-beige interior, but what sets this one apart from mine is that the Hoover family car has such fun problems as a disappearing clutch, a side door that doesn’t close correctly, and a horn that doesn’t quite stop honking. And yet somehow the vehicle manages to hold itself together long enough to travel from Arizona to California and back for the much-heralded Little Miss Sunshine beauty pageant for young girls.

One of the two magnificent aspects of the movie is that the family’s comprised of unlikeable people, that is, normal people to whom you yourself might be related. There’s no hero, exactly (save Olive, the kidlet), because each of the members has some kind of negative vibe going on, whether it’s bankruptcy, smoking, muteness, drug use, or suicide. Oh, sure, they’re a regular Manson Family there, except for the killing bit. Anyway, the family has to shepherd young Olive to the pageant one weekend because she learns at the last minute that she’s become a contestant (she finished fourth in an earlier pageant, but third place got sick) and her usual ride for these pageants is unavailable. So the entire family piles into the microbus (without shovels and rakes and implements of destruction – see if you get that reference), owing to a whole bunch of reasons. Grandpa (Alan Arkin) is going, because he’s responsible for teaching Olive the number she’ll do for the talent portion of the show. Dad Richard (Greg Kinnear) is going because he alone can drive the VW; mom Sheryl (Toni Collette) is going because, well, she wants to. And suicidal uncle Frank (Steve Carell) can’t be left alone, but brother Dwayne (Paul Dano) is perhaps a little young to stay home aloneish.

If this were a typical family movie, you’d expect the dysfunctional clan to grow over the course of their journey, to learn to love each other despite all flaws, to bond and harmonize soulfully behind the dreamy Olive. No way that happens here; these people clearly don’t like each other, except Olive, who’s immune (and/or oblivious) to the negative vibes surrounding her family.

A great deal of the entertainment value of Little Miss Sunshine are the wacky adventures that the group gets into during the ride to Redondo Beach, and it’s not just red herrings that filmmakers toss in to distract you from a crappy plot – you can well imagine these things happening to anyone, such as the aformentioned clutch problem. So the movie automatically feels real to you, not like you’re just watching a bunch of actors going through the motions. And then things REALLY pick up once they get to the pageant.

Like I said, everyone’s sort of dislikable. Grandpa is a drug-using, cranky ol’ coot who’s prone to blunt, profanity-laced tirades. Which makes him several kinds of awesome right there. His son Richard is a controlling goof who completely subscribes to the nine-steps-to-success program that he hawks for a living (“Don’t be a loser!”). Cheryl, who somehow holds the family together, chain smokes and seems the very portrait of crass white trash, while her brother Frank is a gay near-suicide who’s been released into his sister’s care. Oh, and then there’s Dwayne, who’s intentionally mute. Nope, not saying a word, no way, not until he enters the Air Force Academy; it’s some sort of discipline exercise.

And at the center of all this weirdness is little, slightly pudgy Olive, played by the wonderful Abagail Breslin, perhaps best known for playing one of Mel Gibson’s strange kids in Signs. Olive is adorable and real, in contrast to other contestants, who are perhaps adorable but quite artificial. Anyway, Olive seems ignorant of the wacky behavior of her relations except in the most abstract terms, as one might expect from an eight-year-old (meaning she’s not stricken by that Hollywood disease of precociousness). Breslin’s a real treat, and she was rewarded for her excellent performance with an Oscar nomination.

I mentioned two entertaining aspects of the movie; the other is that the denouement isn’t a perfect happy ending. Add that to the realistic – often hysterical, mind you – situations in which the family finds itself, while seemingly not behaving out of character, and you have a gloriously funny film.

***1/2

, , , , , ,

1 Comment

100 Years … 100 Movies

To commemorate the tenth anniversary of the American Film Institute’s 100 Years … 100 Movies series, the Institute is coming out with a new list that (they hope) will include movies from the past decade. As an AFI member, I’ve been asked to cast my vote. Essentially, here’s how it works: They list 400 movies, and you get to vote for up to 100 of them. Then you’re allowed five write-in votes, and they ask you to list your top 5 overall to help with tiebreakers. So,without elaborating, here are my 100: Read the rest of this entry »

2 Comments

299 – Children of Men

In the near future, mankind is in deep trouble. For some reason, all of the women on Earth have gone infertile. Consequently, everyone’s in a state of panic, and anarchy has more or less broken out in the now-dystopian England. Illegal immigrants are swept up and deported, if they’re lucky – many are instead shot down in cold blood. Things look mighty grim as the populace slowly realizes that its own extinction is imminent unless a baby can be born.

A former activist, Theo (Clive Owen), is asked by a former flame, Julian (Julianne Moore) to acquire transit papers – shades of Casablanca – for a young woman who’s trying to get to The Human Project, a band of rebels well outside of London. The woman, named Kee (Claire-Hope Ashitey), is pregnant – the first pregnancy in the world in 18 years. However, the rebels don’t want Kee to fall into the hands of the oppressive regime, because they’re afraid Kee might be “disappeared.” So Theo agrees to attempt to transport Kee to a safe ocean passage to The Human Project, in order to save the human race.

Children of Men is an exhilarating story that simply never lets up, following Kee’s journey from when she meets Theo (and is accompanied by several helpers of varying degrees of morality) through to the bittersweet, tragic ending. It’s not giving anything away to note that bad things happen, and not all who support Kee’s cause will live to see the end of her tale.

The London in Children of Men is apparently a fair representation of the Baghdad of the real world, with disparate factions at war with each other to assume control in a largely lawless (outside of walled areas) society. People are shot without warning and with little provacation, all in the name of protecting the “good” people. Theo, as a bureaucrat, is largely unaffected by the chaos other than minor inconveniences, but when he’s accosted by Julian’s cohorts (the ol’ throw a sack over his head and toss him in a van bit) and sees Julian for the first time in many years, he throws his hat into the ring as well, I think partly for old times’ sake (he used to protest with Julian).

The unrelenting violence in the movie is often jarring, unsettling the viewer and setting one’s teeth on edge. Political atmosphere aside, one desperately hopes Kee is able to succeed in her quest, partly because of the whole saving-mankind bit but also because Kee herself – and those immediately around her – is so believable and likable. She’s no shrinking violet, but she’s also not of the same stripe as the rebels (gritty and raging against the machine); she simply wants to have her baby safely.

The entire cast is dazzling, although the overall success of the film really hinges on the growing relationship between Theo and Kee; Ashitey more than carries her weight in a tough, complex film, and Owen turns in his usual solid work. Moore is ravishing in the few scenes in which she appears, eyes alight, face glowing, you completely believe she’s become this heralded leader of an insurgency. She’s simply divine. As is Sir Michael Caine, in a showy (although somewhat unrecognizable) role as an aging hippie/ex-political cartoonist who’s the cheery, bouncy foil to Theo’s ordinarily morose, workmanlike attitude. Caine’s wonderful, although seen only briefly.

The best part about the movie is, really, the ending. I give nothing away by noting that the film isn’t wrapped up in a neat little box, with confetti and unicorns and flowers falling from the sky. The story does have an air of hope about it, but we do not get closure. I think that’s for the best; imagine if we had an ending in which Kee and Theo ran off into the sunset, her baby saved and life returning to those pre-anarchy days. Instead of cheating us with such a trite Hollywood ending, the filmmakers decided to continue with the overall maybe bad, maybe good tone, to the betterment of the movie.

***1/2

Technorati Tags:

, , ,

No Comments

298 – All the King’s Men (2006)

Willie Stark, a man of the people, is elected governor of the great state of Louisiana only to engage in the same underhanded maneuvers against which he railed in his ascension to the highest elected office in the state. That’s essentially the story behind All the King’s Men, a reportedly faithful adaptation of the Robert Penn Warren novel of the same name (also adapted in 1949), with Sean Penn as Stark and Jude Law as Jack Burden, the journalist who helped propel Stark to fame and fortune.

Told from Burden’s point of view, the story is supposed to show us that although power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely, or something like that. Burden meets Stark before the latter even enters politics, trying to get a new elementary school built to code. Instead, local cronyism allows the school to be built on the cheap, setting the scene for a fire escape to break and kill three children. Stark decides to try to run things his own dang way, but it’s not until he’s energized by Burden and by his aide/lover Sadie Burke (Patricia Clarkson, who’s excellent here) that he transforms himself from just another white dude trying for some power into a galvanized, vibrant, gesticulating lightning rod for the have-nots in the state. Stark jumps from parish to swampland to hovel pledging to rid state government of fat cats and to work for the people. Somewhere along the way, though, he changes into the very thing he’d vowed to eradicate, all in the name of protecting those who could not protect themselves.

Penn is good as Stark, although his accent (along with that of most characters in the film) takes some getting used to, thick as it is. If you’ve ever seen the 1949 version starring Broderick Crawford, though, you might have had in mind someone a bit …larger, perhaps, more substantial. Penn’s a pipsqueak, but he’s a damn fine actor, so he’s somehow able to essay strength, conviction, and tenacity into a larger-than-life character. Were it not for the frequent incomprehensibility of his diction, Penn’s performance might be termed a powerhouse show. But I never got a feeling I knew why Stark changed. One minute he’s gladhandling, the next minute he’s applying pressure to a retired judge who won’t support him (Anthony Hopkins). Where was his motivation? Was it pure greed, lust for power, what? Warren’s novel probably elaborated a bit more than Steve Zaillian’s screenplay did.

At least Penn has a strong supporting cast around him, but Law still didn’t feel quite right as the reporter/columnist. Why did he join up with Stark in the first place? (Stark tells him it wasn’t for money or because Burden believed in Stark but because Stark was what he was and Burden was what HE was, whatever that means.) Essentially, the character of Burden was just a vehicle to tell the story of Stark’s rise and ultimate fall. In fact, that’s basically how the other characters come off as well, just window dressing to whatever scene the bombastic (and iconoclastic) Penn chews up and spits out.

There’s even a contrived romantic subplot – along with the ever-present specter of Buried Secrets – involving Burden and Anne Stanton (Kate Winslet). It’s fun to see Winslet and Law, both of whom have done excellent work elsewhere, but the relationship feels forced, as does the character of Anne’s brother Adam, played by Mark Ruffalo. Such wonderful, youthful talent, wasted! The twists involving these characters are pretty obvious, leading to hamfisted direction and over-the-top acting.

Ultimately, his remake fails to really grab the viewer, leaving one to watch it dispassionately when we should be rooting for Burden (and Stark, at least at the beginning). It should be a story of manipulation and coersion on both psychological and physical fronts. But it is fun, at least, to see Jackie Earle Haley (remember? The Bad News Bears’ Kelly Leak) as Stark’s sharpshooter bodygard.

**

, , , , , ,

No Comments

297 – Pan’s Labyinth

Are you the kind of moviegoer who just doesn’t cotton to subtitled films? If you’re like me, you have enough trouble following the spoken words and the images on the screen without also having to wrestle with text. For me, it’s especially tough when the movie depends strongly on dialog for its success. So for the most part, I avoid subtitled movies. I’ll watch ‘em, but it darn well better be an awesome film.

Pan’s Labyrinth is an awesome film, and I mean that it’s both awe-inspiring and excellent. The movie is full of lush imagery that at times cascades gently over the viewer, lulling them into acquiescence, and other times jarring him into reality. It’s simultaneously beautiful, arresting, dreamy, and terrifying.

The story centers on young Ofelia (Ivana Baquero), a bookish sort who’s been uprooted by her mother Carmen (Ariadna Gil) to live with her new stepfather Capitan Vidal (Sergi Lopez) in a remote military stronghold in Spain during World War II. The Franco government has just assumed control, and Vidal’s troops are there to fight rebels stationed in the woods, all while rationing food to the needy villagers around them.

As if this situation weren’t unnerving enough, Ofelia’s mother is very late in her pregnancy (by the Capitan, of course), and the pregnancy isn’t proceeding smoothly; in an ominous sign, the caravan ferrying Ofelia and Carmen to the castle has to stop when Carmen becomes ill.

On top of dealing with these very real problems, Ofelia finds herself drawn to a huge labyrinth located in the garden of the vast estate. The housekeeper, Mercedes, warns the imaginative Ofelia not to enter the labyrinth, because its myriad turns would be very dangerous indeed for her young charge.

In the middle of her first night in the castle, Ofelia awakes and finds herself drawn to a pit near the labyrinth. Descending its narrow stone stairs, she finds Pan (Faun in Spanish), a servant of the Lord of the Underworld. Pan tells Ofelia that she is actually the Princess of the Underworld, and that she must perform three tasks so that she can leave her human body and return to be by the side of her father.

To describe these three tasks would be to give away a bit too much, but suffice to say that they aren’t as simple as saying one’s prayers or sneaking a loaf of bread away from the kitchen. But Ofelia does choose to complete them; she decides that given the evil of her malignant, torturing stepfather (a despot in training during the Fascist regime), she would rather follow her limitless imagination.

Meanwhile, a parallel storyline involves the rebels, who have a source inside the castle: Mercedes. Vidal is determined to root all of the rebels out of the woods and exterminate them all, and they are equally determined to overthrow him and return freedom to the masses. As well, Carmen’s pregnancy becomes even more difficult, and it is only a matter of time before the three threads come to a head.

Perhaps the most striking of the many visual desserts in the movie is that of the Pale Man, one of the demons that Ofelia must encounter during her travails. The scene is a banquet table with a lush array of foods and drinks. At one end sits a creature. The creature is tall, but humanoid in shape. It has long arms and arrow-sharp fingers with nails resembling talons. It is hairless and virtually skinless as well, and it has no eyes. Its mouth is a gaping maw, bereft of lips; a cold, stark, ugly beast that immediately fills one with horror and dread. On the table before the creature are two eyeballs; when the Pale Man is aroused, it grasps the eyeballs with its gnarled hands and slaps them into the palms, then holds the arms at head’s height in order to see its prey.

Guillermo del Toro’s film is highly imaginative, almost decadent in its lushness, evocative in both beauty and ugliness, in Ofelia’s innocence, Carmen’s and Mercedes’ love, and Vidal’s demonic cruelty. Vidal is a terrible sight, a by-the-book murderous fiend who will stop at nothing to completely eradicate everyone who opposes him, including the weak and the infirm. Lopez’s performance is gut-wrenching, despicable, and sincere. The precocious Baquero, as Ofelia, is a perfect foil to the haunting Vidal, combining her natural, wide-eyed naivete and curiosity with resolve, intelligence, and self-sufficiency.

This original film is Mexico’s 2007 entry as Best Film in a Foreign Language for the Academy Awards, and it really should win. Had it been in English, I have no doubt it would have been considered for Best Picture. It really is that good; don’t let your aversion to subtitles prevent you from seeing one of the most magnificent films of the decade.

****

Technorati Tags:

, ,

No Comments

296 – Superman Returns

Superman’s back and there’s gonna be trouble, hey na, hey na, Superman’s back! Well, hey, if Batman can begin again, Supes can come back to Earth, so to speak, right? Only this time it’s not the late Christopher Reeve or even George Reeves, it’s relative newcomer Brandon Routh as the Man o’ Steel. Seems he’s been gone lo these past five years in deep space, checking the general vicinity of where Krypton once existed. (Astronomers reported they’d found traces of the planet, so off Superman went to check out his home; oddly, neither he nor the astronomers mentioned that he was leaving.)

But now he’s back, and so is, coincidentally, Clark Kent. After reunited with his Earth mom Martha (Eva Marie Saint), Clark returns to work at the Daily Planet, greeted enthusiastically by Jimmy Olson (Sam Huntington) and less enthusiastically by Lois Lane (Kate Bosworth), who’s really moved on. Seems Lois has fallen in love, gotten married, and given birth, all five years ago. Huh, how about that. Her hubby is now an assistant editor at the Planet and is conveniently the nephew of Perry White, played by the magnificent Frank Langella.

Meanwhile, Superman isn’t the only one making a comeback after five years; seems Lex Luthor, put away in prison for what was supposed to be many life sentences, is out on appeal, or something. Anyway, he’s up to no good, and it involves killing billions of people and forcing the survivors to bow to him and lavish him with money and gifts and so on. Kevin Spacey plays Lex this time around, and he’s a great choice – megalomaniacal without being hammy, which is a fine line. Makes one even forget the great Gene Hackman. (Of course, we all know the pitfalls of having a villain who has a stronger personality than the hero, don’t we, Tim Burton?)

So Supes is back, and Perry wants Lois to cover his return, but Lois wants to cover this weird blackout that affected pretty much everyone (notably, a Space Shuttle launch that winds up being saved by Superman, as you’ve no doubt seen in the trailers). Could the two issues be related? “You’re reporters – find out!” Perry growls at his young charges.

There have been scads of comic-book-related movies over the past decade or so, with varying degrees of success, and from what I’ve read of this one it was a bit of a disappointment, both critically and financially (it made $200 million in the US, but it cost $270 million to make). Having said that, though, I liked it. Plenty of great action, as you’d expect from a director like Bryan Singer (who left the X-Men series just to do this). For a change, the big action scenes don’t feel particularly staged, as they can in superhero movies – you know, “Looks like it’s time for Our Hero to…. uh….. lift a train with his bare hands!” and so forth. There were a few “ooooh” scenes that had me gripping the sides of my recliner, especially the plane-about-to-crash scene.

Routh was pretty good as the Man of Steel: taciturn and resolved but conflicted and isolated. Watching him, I got the impression that there was more going on in his head than there ever was in Reeves’ mind; hey, I’m sure Christopher Reeves was a heck of a nice guy, but he wasn’t a terribly good actor. His acting style was more cartoony than realistic, and nowadays that’s not a good style, even for a comic book movie.  But Routh looked the part and, even more importantly, sounded the part as well. (Look for a line from him that echoes his first meeting with Lois Lane in 1978′s Superman: The Movie.)

Spacey, of course, was a lot of fun as Luthor. Mean, evil, intelligent, with a touch of humor and glee – what more could you ask for in a supervillain? Of course, even Spacey can fall victim to a somewhat tepid script; I loved it when Luthor basically tells Lois Lane his evil plans. This information comes in useful for Lois later on. But regardless, at least Spacey didn’t have Luthor laugh maniacally or gesture wildly. You know, hallmarks of cinematic madmen for decades.

Bosworth was miscast as Lois Lane, though. She didn’t look the part (check out her huge forehead – how come the set stylist didn’t have a lock or two fall over her brow?), and she came off as whiny, petulant, conceited, and….. well, just plain annoying. Other actresses who could have done a better job are Keri Russell, Claire Danes, and Scarlett Johansson, all of whom were considered for the role. It’s just a flat performance by an actress who looked at times to be a bit overwhelmed by the role.

So, overall – not a disappointment. Not that awesome thriller that Spider-Man was, not as fantastic as the X-Men movies, not as mysterious as Batman, but still loads better than Daredevil, Elektra, and Fantastic Four. Some sincerely harrowing scenes and a solid performance by Routh lift this one enough to compensate for the weak female lead.

***

, , , ,

1 Comment

Giant (1956)

A sprawling epic if there ever was one, Giant is about two generations of a family of cattle ranchers in Texas, led by patriarch Jordan Benedict (Rock Hudson). Benedict travels to Maryland to buy a horse and winds up with Leslie Lynnton (Elizabeth Taylor), whom he takes home to raise a family with.

Back at the ranch, tension sets in between Benedict’s sister Luz (Mercedes McCambridge) and Leslie; the former feels threatened by the sudden new female presence in the home. Headstrong and full of vigor, Luz is the polar opposite of Leslie. (One neighbor remarks that Luz would rather herd cattle than make love; hmm, an early reference to lesbianism? Maybe, and her name might have been a clumsy clue as well…)

There’s other tension, too, as Leslie doesn’t quite comprehend why certain people (read: Mexican-Americans) are treated so shabbily by the Texans. The issue even threatens to drive a wedge between her and Benedict, and she even returns home (with their three kids, by this point), but Benedict’s able to get her to return. This turns into one of the central themes of Giant, the idea that the manly men of Texas are the only real men out there, and that everyone else – especially anyone from a different country or of a different ethnic background – is well below them in the pecking order.

James Dean, in his final film (he died late during filming), plays a ranch hand turned millionaire with the unlikely name of Jett Rink. Benedict openly dislikes Jett from the git-go and REALLY loathes him when the latter strikes oil on his tiny plot of land and strikes it rich, his wealth soon rivaling (or surpassing) that of Benedicts. Yes, it’s another penis-swinging movie, wherein the two leads try to show the other who is, indeed, The Man. Rink is unsteady, an outcast by nearly everyone else in the film, although it’s Leslie who befriends him shortly before he strikes oil.

Leslie is the one character for whom the audience can root, because she’s basically flawless. She’s the moral compass for the other characters in the film. She rarely raises her voice, but her views are strong. Heck, they’re strong right from the moment she meets Benedict in Maryland, as she somewhat unconsciously derides his prideful state. Leslie is a rarity among Texas women, because she’s an independent thinker (or so the movie instructs us), so naturally her stiff upper lip runs counter to what’s expected of ladies in Texas society.

But all of those tensions are only about half of the story, as the kids of Benedict and Leslie grow and mature and have spouses and kids of their own, and rarely do those choices follow what their father intended. Jordy Benedict, played by a fresh-faced Dennis Hopper, decides not to take over the family ranch and to instead become a doctor; he also marries a Mexican girl, leading to even more tension. And Luz Benedict, named after Jordan Benedict’s sister, falls in love with her dad’s chief rival, Rink. Late in the movie, the specter of racism rears its head, as Jordy’s wife is denied service on the grounds that she’s a “wetback.” Incensed, Jordy takes matters into his own hands, but his pop’s there to help him out.

The film itself is beautiful, with breathtaking shots of the Texas landscape that’ll leave the city folks in the audience pining for wide-open spaces. Without question, the movie should be seen on a big screen, but since it was made in 1956 it’s not terribly likely to show up at any theaters in the near future – watch for revivals or festivals and see it how it was intended.

On the littler screen, leaving aside the size issue entirely, the main problem I have with the film is that it’s a bit dated. Sure, I know there’s still a lot of racial inequality and tension in the world, but I don’t think you’ll hear the word “wetback” bandied about often, and even the way men and women view each other, in terms of respect (even in Texas, yee-ha!), has evolved quite a bit.

Even if one views the movie as a microcosm of 1950s Texas, it’s just not entertaining enough. There’s melodrama, there’s people acting rather predictably, and in the end everyone grows a little. It’s all a little too pat, these lessons of racism and sexism and so forth. Benedict’s such a horse’s ass at the beginning that you openly hope for his death or dismemberment just so he could get some sense knocked into him.

As for the cast, Taylor is magnificent – my GOODNESS, was she well cast! She looks ravishing, with gorgeous wide eyes and a stare that’ll freeze her kidlets from fifty yards. She’s commanding and beautiful. I haven’t seen much of La Liz in her early days, but she’s so fantastic here, I should make it a point to see some others. Hudson and Dean are both okay, although Dean’s Rink is relegated to mumbling and shuffling most of the time and Hudson’s Benedict is stuck with being either a mope or a tyrant. Neither character was particularly appealing, but I never really felt much sympathy toward either, especially for Benedict (although perhaps a little near the end).

In smaller, supporting roles, Hopper is delightful, as is Chill Wills as loyal Uncle Bawley and Carroll Baker (in the same year she did Baby Doll) as Luz Baker II, radiant and luscious and just as independent as her onscreen mom, Taylor.

In all, I found Giant to be a bit of a bore, sad to say, despite Taylor and some great camera work. Watching Giant, despite its length, is sort of like buying a fast-food hamburger; it looks pretty when you see it on the menu, but after you’ve eaten it you still feel kind of empty.

**1/2

Technorati Tags:

, , ,

No Comments

Apollo 13

(Originally published in The Gleaner of Rutgers University-Camden.)

“Houston, we have a problem.”

In the early seventies, this was one phrase that sent chills down the spines of the collective American consciousness. Just a few short years after the United States had made its way to the moon, one of our lunar missions, Apollo 13, was in serious jeopardy. Like the Kennedy assassinations and the original lunar landing in 1969, most Americans have been able to look back at this time period and remember exactly where they were when they heard the news.

For people of the current “Generation X” label, this is a true-life tale whose ending is not necessarily obvious. We all remember the result of Lee Harvey Oswald’s and Sirhan Sirhan’s bullets, of the opening chord of Woodstock in 1967 and the closing notes of Altamont in 1969. We know all about these events because they have been highly publicized. But the problems that Apollo 13 ran into are not nearly as well-known — and this air of mystery is one of the most crucial ingredients in this magnificent action-drama.
Ron Howard, who brought us Backdraft, The Paper, and Parenthood, scores once again with a movie that is not only thrill-a-minute and eminently believable but is also peppered with a compelling cast. Tom Hanks is the leader of the astronauts, the steely mission commander with the lovely wife and kids who seem almost superfluous to the man’s life. This is another tailor-made Oscar role for the acclaimed Hanks, but don’t look for any nominations from the Academy in the Best Actor category. There are so many other fine performances in the movie that Hanks’ work is not the central point of the film. He is supported by Kevin Bacon (Flatliners, Murder in the First) and Bill Paxton (Terminator, Aliens, True Lies). This is easily the finest performance of Paxton’s career, and he should be awarded a Supporting Actor nomination. Bacon is his usual steady self, giving his character a multilayered edge.

But it is not merely the crew of the lunar ship who are compelling. The diligent ground crew in Houston, working feverishly to find a way to save enough energy on the ship so the astronauts may return to the atmosphere safely, is memermizing. Led by Ed Harris (The Abyss, Jacknife, Milk Money), the crew includes a grounded astronaut (Gary Sinise) who, it was felt by officials, was not good enough to make the mission. Harris and Sinise are so galvanizing in their performances that it would come as no surprise if either one received a Best Supporting Actor nomination this year. Harris, sounding Patton-esque, rallies his troops to find a way to get those men back home. “We’ve never lost a man in space, and we’re sure as hell not gonna do it on my watch,” he proclaims.

There is precious little to dislike about Apollo 13. The acting is among the best you’ll ever see. The special effects are peerless. And the direction? Ron Howard gets better every time. The only fault is that the female characters are virtually non-existent; they are included only to look scared and weak. But then again, that’s probably how real life was way back then.

Apollo 13: A+

, , , , , ,

No Comments