Archive for July, 2007

337 – Little Children

“You couldn’t change the past,” the narrator of Little Children tells us at the movie’s close, “but the future could be a different story.” The lives of the men and women who live in the very paragon of bland suburbia appear to be crunchy (and even somewhat unforgiving) on the outside, but inside they break, well, just like a little girl. A veritable sea of emotions, from love, despair, neglect, and hate churns below their pristine, everything-in-its-place veneers.

The placidity of this particular neighborhood is jolted by two things: the arrival of a sex offender (Jackie Earle Haley) and the emergence of a relationship between married-but-not-to-each-other Sarah and Brad; both events, directly and obliquely, are remarked upon by the nattering nabobs of middle-class conservatism in the town, particularly the rather particular hausfraus and soccer moms.

Sarah Pierce (Winslet) is a distant mother and wife; when she and her daughter Lucy visit the neighborhood playground, she sits away from the other mothers. As an indirect result, Lucy doesn’t play with the other boys and girls on the see-saws or merry-go-round – she just plays quietly. Meanwhile, as the empty-headed women babble to each other (but not Sarah), a newcomer enters their midst – a stay-at-home father, Brad, whom they mockingly call (behind his back, of course) “The Prom King.” Sarah’s marriage seems empty and devoid of purpose. Brad, for his part, is married to a breadwinner – his wife Karen (Jennifer Connelly) is a documentary filmmaker who’s completely absorbed with her work. Like Sarah, Brad is a little emotionally distant from his wife and their son, Aaron, so it’s no wonder he and Sarah become constant companions throughout the long, hot suburban summer, spending their days either at the park or at the public pool.

The other main story thread involves the community’s reaction to the presence of Ronnie McGorvey, convicted as a sex offender for flashing a young boy. Soon, there are fliers on telephone poles, and an angry outrage group is formed, led by ex-policeman Larry (Noah Emmerich), who seems to be more upset with Ronnie’s existence than anyone else in the town.

At its core, the movie is about repression and “settling” – staying with someone just because they provide you comfort but no love is no reason at all, the film explains. Committing adultery just might be an okay act, even with children involved, as long as it means a better life for the principals. Brad and Sarah transform from nodding acquaintences to good friends who take care of their kids together (Aaron and Lucy even grow to become friends, although up to that point they’d both been loners.) When the opportunity arises for them to become more, though, they take it – an act that’s not easy to conceal from the prying eyes of the neighbors, let alone their respective spouses and certainly not their children. How long, if at all, can they possibly hope to maintain the charade that they’re just friends? Perhaps the thought that their own, current marriages are charades in their own right gives Sarah and Brad reason to believe they can perpetuate the sham against their spouses.

Meanwhile, Ronnie attempt to cope with living as a sex offender. He lives with his doting mom, who believes there is good in everyone; she realizes that what Ronnie did was wrong, but that it was an accident, and she tries in vain to protect him from the rest of the community, which is by and large out to lynch him. But the brilliant caveat here is that Ronnie is by no means a victim – not only did he do what he was accused of (although he shows remorse and a lot of self-hate), but he shows that he’s capable of more of the same.

In fact, that’s the genius of Todd Field’s film – not only are people flawed, but they’re believably flawed. In Little Children, people make decisions for selfish reasons, and there’s no wondrous epiphany that somehow saves the soul and good standing of the poor decision maker – people live with what they’ve done, or they don’t make the decision in the first place.

Winslet and Haley were nominated for their work here; the first-ever nomination for Haley, who was probably best known as Kelly Leak in the Bad News Bears films. He’s eerie and creepy and utterly human as Ronnie McGorvey. You never really feel sympathy for the deviant, but you might feel a twinge of unease. For Winslet, this was the fifth nomination for the beauteous Briton, and it’s astounding that she hasn’t yet won. Then again, she’s only 31 years old!

Little Children is a stark, seamless, unsettling story that grabs a hold of your psyche and twists it almost to the breaking point, relying on strong performances by Winslet, Haley, Wilson, and Emmerich as well as a tortuous plot that provides quite a jaded look at the tranquility of suburban life.

***1/2

, ,

No Comments

336- Dreamgirls

After you cut through the electrifying songs and dazzling choreography in Bill Condon’s story of a Detroit girl band struggling to succeed in the sixties and seventies, you’re left with a fairly typical rise-and-fall story, but because of the powerful performances turned in by the phenomenal Jennifer Hudson (who won an Oscar) and the dynamic Eddie Murphy (who was nominated for one), the movie rises above typical showbiz biopics, even the fake ones.

The Dreamettes are Effie (Hudson), a bombastic diva with a strong voice; Deena (Beyonce Knowles), a willowy, softer touch; and Lorrell (Anika Noni Rose), the youngest of the bunch. They’re not succeeding on the local talent-show circuit, so they hook up with the famed James “Thunder” Early (Murphy) to perform as his backup singers, which doesn’t sit too well with Effie. They’re coached along by Curtis Taylor (Jamie Foxx), who attempts to mold them into crossover artists, leaving the placid world of the R&B charts behind for the bigger fame and fortune of the nationwide pop charts.

Naturally, as some stars rise, others must fall. Early’s great, and wildly charismatic, but he’s not always what Curtis wants in a star who can appeal to a wide audience. Sowing the seeds of his own destruction, Jimmy falls prey to the usual pitfalls of stardom – money, drugs, and the knowledge that he’s no longer the man of the moment. Meanwhile, the Dreamettes are persevering, first as his backup trio and then on their own, conquering what was somewhat deprecatingly called the chitlin circuit. Curtis has grander plans, though; he wants his charges to eventually play Miami, a place far away from Detroit, a place where, as Curtis tells Jimmy, they won’t even let black people wait on tables. (Remember, this is in the early sixties.)

The movie is based on a Broadway musical, so the songs and choreography – all wonderful – are derived directly from the stage presentation; this may seem a little strange, because given the setting (Motown in the sixties), it seems like there should be bona fide R&B hits coming at you, although admittedly a lot of the songs do sound similar to chart-toppers from that time. In fact, the fashion styles and the songs remind you very strongly of some (figurative) heavyweights in the field at that time: Aretha Franklin and Diana Ross. (It’s been said that the Dreamgirls were supposed to be The Supremes, but the movie was merely inspired by the real-life Supremes, which explains why there aren’t more real-life names bandied about in the movie; it’s not biographical story.)

There’s no question that Hudson, in her first role, and Murphy, the longtime comedy-film veteran, truly sparkle in their roles and were each deservedly nominated for Academy Awards (Hudson won; Murphy lost to Alan Arkin). As for Hudson – she can SING. I mean, she belts out the tunes with a fantastic mixture of passion, guts, and anger, as best befitting her largely (no pun intended) unhappy character, Effie. And when you watch Murphy, you completely forget he once recorded a song called “(My Girl Wants to) Party All the Time,” and the singer he most reminds you of is James Brown. He’s spectacular.

Not so spectactular was Foxx as Curtis Taylor; he was far too low key and, well, morose. He’s somewhat believable in turning from a naif in the music world to a cutthroat businessman, but he lacks the screen presence – the panache – to really pull it off. Denzel Washington was reportedly offered the role but declined on the grounds that he can’t sing – although I’m sure dubbing wouldn’t have made a huge difference.

Still, it’s not much to carp about. The songs are perfect, and the final number is a huge showstopper that’ll leave you clapping for more.

***

,

No Comments

That’s no moon.

Post title has nothing to do with post content. Ask your doctor if Frothy Ruminations is right for you.

So apparently there’s this big, super-sekrit movie coming out in January from JJ Abrahms, the guy who’s behind Lost and is involved with the new Star Trek movie, whenever it comes out. Anyway, the plot’s under wraps, the cast is under a gag order, and the damn thing’s not even titled yet. But they have geeks working on a viral marketing campaign, so the trailer’s been released. You have to check out this trailer. The movie might be a bomb, but I like the concept. The trailer, if nothing else, is pretty frightening, which is probably exactly what they’re shooting for…

Next, The Times Online (that would be the London Times, you revolting colonies) has a piece on the top 50 movie robots. Big surprise? How about C-3P0 (not C3-PO) at number 45? 45? It’s C-3P0! He’ll talk your ass off! C’mon, he has to rank higher. Has to.

And in case you haven’t seen this yet, here’s JK Rowling talking about what happens to the HP characters after the final Harry Potter book. Note: Spoilers abound for Book 7. Do not click this if you haven’t read the last book and do plan to

Here’s an idiotic article from ABC News about Coreys Haim and Feldman. Over and over, I’m reading that these two nimrods were “pioneers” in the field of being a child star, that they “have been called the original child stars …” Wha? These two dorks were popular in the 1980s. Does ABC believe no films were made, starring kids, before then? What about Tatum O’Neal? 1970s. Let’s go back further! How about Bobby Driscoll, the star of Treasure Island and Song of the South, who died of a drug overdose in 1968? There have been a LOT of child stars gone wrong over the years – to say these knuckleheads are the first is asinine.

,

No Comments

335 – The Simpsons Movie

When a TV show finally hits the big screen, what should the movie have that the show didn’t? Obviously, stuff you can’t get past the censors on television; jokes that are even more adult in nature, drug use, nudity, even some profanity – as long as the basic characterizations and tone of your program aren’t mucked with. Right? I mean, what’s the point, otherwise? And that’s exactly what the cleverly titled The Simpsons Movie manages to do, shoehorning pithy comments and witty repartee into a relatively brief (87 minutes) cinematic explosion, a supernova of one of comedy’s brightest stars.

Now, often full-length feature versions of a TV show will simply be a long episode, or a couple of episodes strung together semicohesively. And semicoherently. But Matt Groening and James L. Brooks takes a plausible-for-the-Simpsons storyline and ratchets up… well, everything. There’s more visual and verbal humor, more characters (though not new ones, really), more exciting locales – not just Springfield – and tons of in-jokes, most of which the intended audience is going to fawn over like Bambi’s momma. (Speaking of which, there’s an amusing scene in which Adorable Woodland Creatures help get Homer and Marge ready for their coital bed.)

The basic plotline is that after a lot of nagging by one Lisa Simpson, the horribly polluted Lake Springfield – where people dump crap, dead bodies, and toxic waste – has finally been cleaned up. Mayor Quimby is especially proud of their new deterrent system to prevent people from dumping – it’s a wall. But wouldn’t you know it, it’s only so idiotproof, and Homer winds up throwing an entire silo of pig poop (don’t ask) into the lake, immediately killing it and causing some mutant creatures to develop. The EPA, noting this, decides that the entire area must be sealed off, so they put a huge glass dome around Springfield. No one can get in, and most importantly no one – especially toxic waste – can get out. No wonder that in short time the rest of the Springfield citizenry rise up and form an angry mob out to get the Simpsons.

As I said, there’s nudity – but, sadly, it’s not anyone you’d want to see naked. No, not even Patty or Selma. And, believe it or not, there’s death! Of course, it’s not like any of the Simpsons themselves die, or even a secondary character. But hey, there are literally scores of characters in the Simpsons universe, so it’s okay if one of them bites it, right? And double hey, it’s not as if the movie is part of any grand continuity – if someone gets hurt in the movie, I’m betting they’ll be peachy keen next time you see them in the TV show.

To be sure, even though there’s some envelope pushing and such, the characters remain who they are – Homer is a complete screwup who somehow manages to both destroy and save everyone at least once; Bart is a selfish brat who picks on his sister and is susceptible to dares; Lisa is a dreamy brain who pines for a new boy; and Marge is the proverbial glue that usually holds them somewhat together.

The movie’s not very long, which might be its only real debit. It’s wildly amusing, and the movie makes the best use out of its short running time, being chock full o’ jokes and references that only Comic Book Guys in their mom’s basement will get. Thankfully, there are very few celebrity voices – one Name does the voice of the chief bad guy, with the EPA, and another plays himself. (I’m not even including the brief appearance by Green Day, though.) I like that – it’d be too easy for the Bigwigs to shovel in celebrity after celebrity, as has happened in many a Simpsons episode over the years.

Our favorite yellow family survives its first foray onto the silver screen – the movie is so well done, it feels like an episode from the middle years of the series without seeming like a simple extension of the show. It’s hysterical, appropriately raunchy, and just absurd enough to be the ne plus ultra of animated movies. Well, at least those that are animated in a traditional (i.e., not wholly computerized) style. So pass the donuts and gulp down your Duff brew!

***

,

No Comments

Karen Allen in Indy 4

Woo-hoo! Looks like Karen Allen – who’s done jack-crap in the ensuing 26 years – is going to reprise her role as Marion Ravenwood in the still-untitled new Indiana Jones movie, due out May 2008. That’s pretty cool news; she joins Harrison Ford (duh), Ray Winstone, Shia LeBeouf, Cate Blanchett, and John Hurt.

This is cool, because her character was great in RotLA, and Allen did a far better job as the romantic interest/femme fatale than either Kate Capshaw (IJatToD) or Allison Doody (IJatLC) would. (In fact, Capshaw was particuarly awful, and the film suffered immeasurably as a result.)

,

No Comments

Harry Potter IS Alex Gordon

You know, Alex Gordon. Baseball player. Kansas City Royals.

Okay, so maybe I’m not done talking about Harry Potter. He lives on, even though the books are over; heck, we have two more movies to go.

Anyway, this post is for baseball fans. The rest of you don’t have to worry about it, because you won’t understand.

Baseball Prospectus has an insightful, delicious article that compares current members of the Kansas City Royals to various characters in the Potterverse. Now, I’m no great follower of Royals baseball – and I suspect few are, since they’re pretty awful – but it’s a funny, interesting read. (Note: this may contain spoilers for books 1-6; the author hadn’t yet read book 7, so no spoilers from it.)

Example:

Alex Gordon = Harry Potter

Both are The Chosen One. Both had highly anticipated debuts. From that point on… well, let’s just say that if Book 7 ends with Harry dying when he swings and misses at an Avada Kedavra, you’ll know where J.K. Rowling got her inspiration. An early clue: if the final chapter is entitled “The Boy Who Sucked.”

No Comments

Harry Potter and the Butt of Embarrassment

To continue the Harry Potter theme …

I’ve read all of the books, but I’ve never been one to dress up in Hagrid’s costume and run down the freeway shouting Death to Muggles. And, luckily for everyone, I also don’t have to wait for others in my family to finish the book before I get my Grubbly-Plank hands on it; nor do I have to vie for the attentions of my siginificant other while has her head between the book’s pages, trying to figure out if a thestral has three toes or five. And finally, I don’t run the risk of embarassing my offspring because we happen to like the same dorky series of books.

In other words, I’m not like this guy, over at I-Mockery.

Representative quote:

“As the ‘piece de resistance’, after a moment of staring goggle-eyed at the crowd, I shall wail “HARRY POTTER DIES ON PAGE 729!!” and burst into tears.

Honestly I have no more idea than you do if Harry dies, or even if the book has 729 pages. But believe you me, to a hoard of pre-teen fans up way past their bedtime, a middle aged, slightly overweight, caged father in a loin cloth eating a hoagie and getting mayonnaise everywhere has a great deal of credibility. At least enough to start a riot.”

No Comments

334 – Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

At a little over two hours long, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is tightly plotted, requiring at least an informal acquaintance with the first four movies. But it’s also very well imagined, and what dirctor David Yates did choose to show on the screen was more than sufficient to tell the story of Harry’s fifth year at Hogwarts.

At the end of the fourth movie, Harry emerged from the Triwizard tournament with news that Voldemort had returned, and that Cedric Diggory had been killed by him moments earlier. Of course, this news was met with quite a bit of skepticism by the rest of the magic world, most prominently the Ministry of Magic and the Daily Prophet, the two places to which ordinary wizards look for solid, substantiated information. Even some at Hogwarts are dubious about Harry’s claims, although not the school’s headmaster, Albus Dumbledore.

Because the Minister of Magic believes Dumbledore is out for his job and because he’s jealous of the relationship the great wizard has with Harry, Hogwarts soon is beleagured by a brand-new Defense Against the Dark Arts teacher, Dolores Umbridge, whose lesson plan seems to be to prevent students from learning how to defend themselves against the Dark Arts, an act of repression that stirs Harry to begin to teach his fellow students on his own, away from the watchful eye of Umbridge, whose unctuous demeanor and oleaginous personality get her appointed as Grand Inquisitor of Hogwarts, allowing her to enact decrees of such oppressive, hate-filled magnitude that the students are more determined than ever to fight back.

Meanwhile, poor Harry is having terrible visions and nightmares, as he shares some sort of psychic connection with the Dark Lord. Seems Voldemort desires something, something tangible in the Ministry of Magic – but what? Harry’s burning forehead scar tells him little, but what visions he does get aren’t merely prophetic – they’re of things happening right at that moment.

The denouement comes with a terrible, terrifying battle royale at the Ministry itself. Sadly, one of the Good Guys doesn’t survive.

I enjoyed a lot of things about this fifth movie: the performances of newcomers Evanna Lynch (Luna Lovegood), Imelda Staunton (Umbridge), Helena Bonham Carter (a delightfully unhinged Bellatrix Lestrange) as well as the veterans of the series – Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Ralph Fiennes, Julie Walters, David Thewlis, Gary Oldman, and Michael Gambon; the jaw-dropping special effects, especially those of the ghostly thestrals, which only Luna and Harry can see, among their friends; and the wonderful Room of Requirement and Number Twelve, Grimmauld Place (Sirius’ parents’ home).

Quite a bit of the book’s plot is missing from the movie, of course, including all of the Quidditch scenes and the many scenes in which the students practice for and take their O.W.L. exams; there’s also an important sequence in which Harry, Ron, and Hermione visit St. Mungo’s to see Mr. Weasley and see Neville visiting his comatose mother and father – up until that point, only Harry knew about the Longbottoms’ fate.

About an hour after watching this movie in the theater (a week after it was released), I read the seventh and final book in the Harry Potter series, making this a true Harry Potter weekend. Really, I’m about Pottered out entirely right now. Reading the book and then writing this review means I may have forgotten a few things from the movie that I wanted to mention; did I hear about such and such via the seventh book or via the fifth movie? Hmm.

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is about what it should be – it’s compelling, wildly entertaining, and it keeps in the spirit of the books, if not the preceding movies; the tone continues to darken as we rocket to the the finale of Harry’s life at Hogwarts and as the bonds of friendship and loyalty tighten around our collective inquisitive minds.

***1/2

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

333 – The Last King of Scotland

Supposedly, Idi Amin’s official, obviously self-awarded title was “His Excellency President for Life, Field Marshal Al Hadji Doctor Idi Amin, VC, DSO, MC, Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Sea, and Conqueror of the British Empire in Africa in General and Uganda in Particular.” I note this in case you’re on the fence as to whether the Ugandan dictator (sorry, president) was indeed a madman.

Amin was the “people’s choice” leader of the central-African nation Uganda from 1971 to 1979, a reign marred by mass murders, cannibalism, and generally rude behavior on the part of the Fearless Leader toward, well, anyone not him. In other words, not a particularly fun time to be a Ugandan, or to visit Uganda.

In the Last King of Scotland, Amin is played by Forest Whitaker, who turns in an Oscar-winning performance as the unhinged leader; it is a singularly magnificent exhibition, a prime example of an actor simply disappearing into a role. Gone is the goofy persona from Good Morning, Vietnam, or the morose hitman from Diary of a Hitman; Whitaker is finally at center stage. And where you might expect some actors to ham things up a bit, playing a larger-than-life character, Whitaker comes across as honest and eminently believable. His Amin believes in Uganda, wants to see it prosper, but he’s drawn by the centralized power and damaged by bouts of insecurity and self-doubt.

The story is told through the eyes of Nicholas Garrigan (James McAvoy), a young Scotsman who arrived at Uganda hoping to make a difference in the health of Ugandans but who wound up as the personal physician – and a bit more – of the country’s unstable president. Garrigan’s wide eyed, but not so wide eyed that he can’t pause to bed seemingly every woman he lays eyes on. I guess it’s the rowdy Scot in him, or something. Anyway, he goes from being a simple country doctor (and making eyes at his colleague’s wife) to the presidential palace, where he naturally beds one of Amin’s many wives. Nothing good can come of that.

Whitaker’s superb, of course, but McAvoy seemed a little more transparent as the dictator’s right-hand man, his number-one closest advisor. McAvoy’s Garrigan seemed to wilt in the presence of Amin, which makes sense until you realize part of the characterization is that Garrigan stands up to Amin; that’s why the latter respects the former. Even the way Garrigan and Amin meet seems wrong. There’s an accident, and the president needs some mending (sprained hand); meanwhile, a cow that had been hit by a car is braying in pain. No one is doing anything about it, so Garrigan grabs Amin’s gun – with all his soldiers around him, mind you – and shoots the cow several times. Problem solved. Only we’d seen no evidence that Garrigan could handle a gun or that he was comfortable around them, and we saw virtually nothing after that that would imply he was the strong, heroic type. And, really, grabbing the new president’s gun in full view of his heavily armed soldiers? Doesn’t make much sense. Later on, toward the end of the movie, Garrigan makes two ridiculously stupid decisions, too, putting the whole notion of his intelligence to the lie.

The biggest problem, though, is that nearly all of Garrigan’s problems can be traced to one source – his penis. Yeah, I said it. If he’d kept the thing in his pants, he wouldn’t have been in ANY trouble with Amin and would have found it a bit easier to eventually leave the country and return to Scotland.

But the bottom line is that this is Whitaker’s movie, despite the perspective, and he’s so perfect that it’s easy to forgive McAvoy’s lightweight performance and the plot oddities. The Last King of Scotland is a cut above most historical movies, because even knowing the ending won’t spoil the fun. It’s also exquisitely photographed (in Uganda itself), and it’s riddled with electric scenes.

***

, , ,

No Comments

The Ten

College Humor is a humor site with a college audience. I’m serious! It has pretty funny crap, including pictures and videos, and their articles are outstanding. It’s not a movie site, really, so I haven’t mentioned it here before. But now it’s listed in my Blogroll. (See right.) (No, your other right.)

A while ago, I signed up with CH in a link-swapping deal. After signing up, I realized they wanted me to send THEM traffic, and then they’d send me some. Sure, that’ll happen. Lots of people come here first and need a new place to go to.

Anyway, I got an email from them today wondering where the heck their promised traffic was. They said, “According to our stats, you owe us 6,470 clicks (from the past 120 days).”

They also gave me a “leaked” clip of a movie coming out in just a few weeks, The Ten from David Wain of The State and Wet Hot American Summer; it’s about the Ten Commandments and if they had been meant literally. (Which in itself sounds like a dopey comedy premise – don’t tons of people already believe that?)

They gave me the clip so I’d post it here and drive traffic to them, I guess. I looked at the clip. It sucks. The movie looks AWFUL. It’s supposed to be a comedy, but it’s painfully unfunny. I mean, cringe-inducing crap.

Take a look for yourself. Stupid College Humor.

Here’s the URL. I can’t embed it here; probably because WordPress sucks, too.

http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1767468

,

No Comments

332 – Bobby

It’s tough to make a movie about 1960s America nowadays. Any documentary or encyclopedia entry on the decade will note that its final years were “turbulent” or “chaotic” and that there was this grand coming together of various revolutions – cultural, political, sexual. Things Happened in the late 1960s. Change was Effected. Gone was the bland, colorless 1950s lifestyles that Ma and Pa Kettle loved, the workaday, nothing-changes lives, a time when you could expect things to go as they always had. But once all of these changes began to occur and people from different walks of life found they had things in common with strange, exotic people, the result was a hodge podge of everything that made America unique in the world. With such a potpourri of dizzying issues, any movie about the period is sure to fall short.

This is not the case with Emilio Estevez’s brilliant Bobby. Bobby follows the lives of 22 disparate people during the weekend of June 5, 1968, at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles – the time and place of Robert F. Kennedy’s assassination shortly after a campaign speech – their interactions with each other, and how each is affected by Kennedy’s presence that weekend.

Perhaps intentionally, Estevez’s film pays homage to Robert Altman’s classic Nashville, which used the same ensemble-cast formula and was centered around a political speech and musical concert. Estevez wisely never follows one character for too long, lest we think the focus is on anything but the overarching theme of Change. He also doesn’t swoop in for close ups of his many stars, opting for a much more realistic portrayal. The camera follows an actor as he or she moves into a new room, rather than being in the room as he or she enters. That sort of thing.

But here’s where the movie is incredible genius. We know what happens. We know exactly how the movie is going to end. It’s not a mystery; everything builds up to Kennedy’s murder. And yet somehow, we’re still stunned, absolutely thunderstruck when it happens. No! Not Bobby! Why? Why? I mean, I wasn’t even around in 1968, and I was first captivated and then devastated by the senselessness of the killing. Bobby Kennedy, the film tells us, was more than a political candidate. He was a true unifier, a man who honestly felt bad about all the crap that had happened, the seemingly endless war in Vietnam and the intracountry violence that threatened to really tear the country apart. He campaigned not on the coattails of his martyred brother’s legacy but on his own strong ideals and compassion. Everyone, it seemed, loved Kennedy – whites, blacks, Hispanics, rich people, poor people, the distaff middle class, everyone. Except, of course, for his eventual killer.

The cast features a lot of big names. Anthony Hopkins. Demi Moore. Martin Sheen. Christian Slater. Sharon Stone. Lindsey Lohan. Elijah Wood. Some are better known for their offscreen exploits nowadays, some haven’t had much of a career in years. But Estevez manages to eke out some tremendous, galvanizing, gut-wrenching performances from everyone. Seriously, not one insincere note is sounded; there’s no hamminess, no vamping, no divas, no egos. It’s an acting clinic. You forget these are big Hollywood stars and can almost believe everyone’s a nonactor who happens to be really, really good.

Above all, even with his audience knowing the precise ending, Estevez never takes away that which audiences hold most dear – hope. The assasination of Bobby Kennedy was crippling to many in 1968, and by extension the viewing audience in 2006, but even his death could not destroy the hope of getting past the bad times. When Bobby is over, you feel like you’ve been socked in the stomach by your dog. But then you look at your dog, and your dog looks at you, and you realize it’s gonna be okay after all.

****

, , , , , , ,

1 Comment