Archive for April, 2009
446 – State of Play
Posted by frothy in State of Play on April 19, 2009
In this complicated but slightly above-average political thriller, a rumpled newspaper reporter (Russell Crowe) unearths a conpiracy involving an old friend, a sitting congressman (Ben Affleck); the politician’s murdered mistress; a private-security corporation; low-rent drug dealers; and adultery. Crowe’s grim, appealing performance, along with Rachel MacAdams’ turn as a plucky blogger, keep the energy amped up just enough to hold interest, although ultimately the use of red herrings and a deus ex machina prevent this movie from being all that it can be.
A thief is killed in an alley; the next day, a pretty congressman’s aide is killed in a D.C. train station. Disheveled old-school newsman Cal McAffrey (Crowe) soon discovers a connection between the two, but Della Frye (MacAdams), a blogger for the paper, steals his thunder with a sensationalistic piece on the paper’s website. Realizing they are pursuing different angles of the same story, McAffrey and Frye join forces, descending into the seamy underbelly of the capital city. Who had Sonia Baker killed, and why? The answers, naturally, will expose a highly intertwined network of corruption from Rep. Collins and outward.
In many ways, this movie is just like any other conspiracy-in-Washington thriller; there’s twists and turns, some plausible and some not, and just when you think you have it all figured out, BAM, you’re wrong, sorry, Charlie. That’s really standard issue for this kind of thing, all set against quick DC exterior shots and to a pulse-pounding percussion soundtrack.
And many of the elements of the movie seem awfully familiar. Like how all politicians are corrupt. And how there must always be some ink-stained wretch tenaciously clinging to pre-Internet values. Oh, and a tense chase-and-fight in an underground garage. And a tough-as-nails editor (here played with profane Britishness by Dame Helen Mirren).
But what State of Play brings to the table is a passionate, earthy Russell Crowe, who instills a real sense of justice and good old fashioned journalism, even as the intricate web inevitably ensnares him as well. Crowe’s gravitas makes the movie, really; try to picture a comparative thespian lightweight, like Nicolas Cage, or a movie star, like Tom Hanks or Brad Pitt, in this role, and you can’t. Crowe’s Cal isn’t pretty to look at, which lends the character credibility, and his single-minded pursuit of what he believes is the truth – despite his own conflict of interest. All that matters is the story, Cal McAffrey thinks, and as he steadfastly pursues the truth, he gladly uses those who would be his friends.
Crowe is half the story, however; the story itself is the other half. While the emphasis is on the whodunit angle of the caper, under that is the role that the media plays in investigating powerful conspiracies. For as much as McAffrey wishes to believe he’s just doing his job, it’s obvious that he’s pretending that his own involvement in the story has nothing to do with the story itself. This moral ambiguity, which seems plain in real life, helps color the movie in a way that definitely does set the movie apart from others of its ilk.
The supporting cast is also worth mentioning. MacAdams is very good as the green, wide-eyed rookie (“don’t show those dewy cub-reporter eyes to me!” bellows Mirren); Mirren herself is gritty as the chief, although I’m not sure why her character has a British accent here. She couldn’t do an American one? (Yes, I’m aware the movie is based on a BBC series, but still.) Also showing up are Jeff Daniels as a calm fellow politico and Robin Wright Penn, in a subtle, endearing role as the congressman’s wife. Oh, and Ben Affleck, but sadly he’s by far the nadir of the entire film; vapid, bland, and useless, Affleck should have been replaced by someone with a personality.
***
445 – Forgetting Sarah Marshall (**)
Posted by frothy in Forgetting Sarah Marshall on April 10, 2009
Forgetting Sarah Marshall is, to use a lazy term, forgettable. It suffers from a not-quite-with-it leading man (who also wrote the screenplay) and scenes that are more cringe worthy than uncomfortably hilarious, not to mention a dragged-out, unnecessary ending. But other than that, it was okay.
Peter (Jason Segal) is a musician who writes the ominous music for a hot crime show on TV. His girlfriend Sarah (Kristen Bell) is one of the stars of said show, and all is well until she breaks up with him while he’s naked. (Okay, that was sort of funny, although I could have done without the full frontal, personally.) After weeks of pining and whining, Peter is encouraged by his stepbrother (a sardonic Bill Hader) to take a vacation, which Peter does – to Hawaii.
But wouldn’t you know it, Sarah and her new beau-with-whom-she-cheated-on-Peter, Aldous (Russell Brand), show up at the exact same resort at which Peter is staying – seems it’s one they talked about visiting. Oh, this might be awkward, huh? Thanks to the good graces of the hotel’s comely customer-service rep (Mila Kunis), Peter gets the best suite in the house.
So he’s in a tropical resort with his now-ex and her man right there. What could possibly go wrong? Plenty, of course, which is what you expect from a raunchy slapstick comedy like this. But it doesn’t always work.
One problem is that Peter isn’t quite the likable schlub that you’d get from, say, someone like Seth Rogen. Sometimes he’s a sweet, sensitive guy, and other times he’s a bit of a jerk; but either way, he’s so passive that it seems as if the character just disappears. The blame for this has to rest with Segal, who doesn’t seem really cut out for being a leading man. He’s nice, he’s affable, but he has little gravitas or appeal.
Another problem is that there are a few mean-spirited moments. I mean, it’s all well and good if the villain does something mean to the hero, because then we feel added sympathy toward the hero. But when the hero acts like a jerk, he has to believably redeem himself, and here it’s just a little too limp of a redemption for me.
On the bright side, Russell Brand does a lot with what could have been a one-note role, that of a womanizing rocker who’s theoretically Sarah’s new boytoy. I haven’t really encountered the British funnyman before, and I was very happy to see him steal every scene he’s in. Must be something about that accent and the nihilistic, devil-may-care attitude.
Equally luminous was Kunis, in a wonderful performance as the desk girl who finds herself in the middle of an ex-lovers’ battle. Kunis is not only beautiful to look at, her personality and delivery engage you to really believe there’s something more going on behind those eyes. Not a small accomplishment for an attractive actress – they’re a dime a dozen. Kunis’s Rachel isn’t perfect; she’s just as susceptible to petty jealousy and hurt as anyone else, and it takes a good actress to project that sort of emotion.
The ending is really bad, though. There was a point in the movie where everything could have ended nicely. This is a comedy, after all, so a happy ending is sort of what we’re geared up to expect. And it doesn’t matter if a happy ending is neat and tidy, with no loose ends; it just needs to be satisfying. So the movie ends, but it doesn’t – it drags on for another thirty minutes or so, back to the mainland. I guess everyone figured only a literal change of scenery would salvage the movie. But they were wrong.
**
444 – Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist
Posted by frothy in Nick and Nora's Infinite Playlist on April 7, 2009
Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist is one of those movies that can be very easy to like if you’re in the right frame of mind. It recalls teen romance with some accuracy, particularly late-night, cross-town romps and that dizzy feeling you get when you start to like someone new. But if you have bad (or mediocre) memories of your high school years, this might strike you as salt in long-festering wounds, or maybe you’re just a grouch who can’t even smile when life works out for even a smidge of a second for two young lovers.
Nick (Michael Cera) plays in an otherwise-all-gay rock band. (It’s not a gay-themed band; most of the members are gay. Oh, you knew what I meant.) He’s sort of pining for his ex, Tris (Alexis Dziena), a bitchy half-pint who gleefully manipulates Nick at every turn, even laughing at him behind his back for his CD mixes – which she then palms off to her friend Nora (Kat Dennings), who (of course) loves them to death and secretly pines for Nick. (Whew.)
After a show (to which Tris has shown up, the better to mess with Nick’s mind), Nora is put in the uncomfortable position of having to account for being dateless – so she impulsively grabs Nick and asks him to pretend to be her boyfriend for five minutes. Which, of course, turns into several hours.
The backdrop against which this budding relationship is set is the pursuit of an oddball band called Where’s Fluffy? See, Where’s Fluffy is playing somewhere in the city, at some point during the evening, and people can find the location only through cryptic radio-DJ clues and word of mouth, which naturally leads to a lot of running around New York with no clear destination in mind. Just like we all did, although perhaps on smaller scales.
Michael Cera here plays another sensitive lad (see also Juno and Superbad), and although he’s in danger of being typecast, it’s obvious he’s really, really good at it. His Nick isn’t just your garden-variety “nice boy”; he’s a good kid who has an actual personality and spine; it’s just that his love for Tris, however misplaced, blinds him to her shenanigans.
Kat Dennings is Cera’s soulmate equal as Nora: she’s strong and passionate, with a quick and acerbic wit. The uncertainty she feels – should she dip her toe in the pool or jump right in – is palpable and realistic and not a little bit endearing. Your heart breaks – again, if you’re in the right mood for this to begin with – when her off-on-off connection with Nick has slid by the wayside. It’s the abilities of Dennings an Cera to not only draw you into their story but accept unreservedly any difficulties that come their way.
Another reason all of this works is that Nick and Nora’s individual blemishes are achingly real to almost anyone who’s gone through the pangs of young love. Or the pangs of high school, for that matter. Nick and Nora’s Infinite Playlist, at its heart, is really about love and how it can pop up almost anywhere it’s desired. The two leads are warm and winning, ultimately selling the film.
***
Check it out: Toy Stories 1 and 2 to be rereleased in 3D as a double feature
Posted by frothy in News/Rumors on April 7, 2009
From IGN:
“Get ready go back to infinity (and beyond!) as Walt Disney Studios prepares to unleash both Toy Story and Toy Story 2 back to theatres in Disney Digital 3-D. The limited double-feature engagement will begin October 2, 2009. Both films have been meticulously re-rendered in 3-D from the original digital files using the latest state-of-the-art technology. ”
The crass pessimist in me says, “Of course they’re doing this! They’ll make more money with a release, then release the shebang on DVD and Blu-Ray.” The cockeyed optimist in me says, “HOORAH! We get to see TS 1 and 2 in full-fledged, brand-new 3D!” The pessimist in me has nothing to say to that.
3D has come a long way in only 14 years. This will make two classics look even better to those who’ve seen them on a big screen, and it’ll introduce (reintroduce) the movies to another new generation, one that wasn’t around in 1995. This is win-win.
Best part? You’ll get to see both of them for one movie ticket’s price. That’s it. None of this buying two tickets crapola.
Rorschach to be Freddy Krueger?
Posted by frothy in News/Rumors on April 6, 2009
According to Variety, via Gawker:
“Jackie Earle Haley is moving to Elm Street, signing to star as iconic killer Freddy Krueger in New Line and Platinum Dunes’ relaunch of A Nightmare on Elm Street.”
What we don’t know – or maybe we do, and it’s just me who doesn’t know – is whether this is an actual redo/reboot of the original NoES or if it’s supposed to be a look at how Freddy came to be, a sort of prequel. (Later films in the series did talk about how Freddy’s mom was gangraped, hence the impetus for his demonicness.)
Jackie Earle Haley is 14 years younger than Robert Englund, but you could see him playing the creep, although I’m not sure about his ability to toss off one liners.
They don’t always just back up the Brink’s truck, just usually
Ever wonder how movie stars make their money? We all know they don’t get a paycheck every two weeks with weird crap like FICA taken out; they have more intricate ways of getting their cash.
Gawker has an awesome post that’s full of info and short on droning, so I think it’s essential.
Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 trailer
Huh. Ok, so you take Denzel Washington, who’s won two Oscars, and John Travolta, who’s a wacky Scientologist who flies his own plane, and you put them in a remake of a taut, suspenseful thriller from the seventies, and you think it might be good, right?
See, I just don’t know. It does sound pretty good and all, but this trailer makes me think it’s gonna be awful. Washington looks like he’s slumming, and are they trying to have a beard-off or something? Neither one of them screams “blue collar,” to be honest.





People Had This to Say