Archive for January, 2010
Gene Hackman is 80 Mother#$%$#% Years Old!
I swear I am not making that up. Today, Gene Hackman, perhaps the greatest actor of his generation not named Brando or Nicholson, is an octogenarian. He wasn’t one yesterday; this is new for him.
You may remember Mr. Hackman from such movies as The French Connection, Hoosiers, The Poseidon Adventure, Superman, and Unforgiven. The man made a career out of playing leading men, weird characters, genial supporting roles, and so on. And, of course, he was half the impetus behind the famed Caine-Hackman theory.
80 years old! Now, Hackman retired from the business a few years back (after 2004′s Welcome to Mooseport, which was a bomb), but when he retired I didn’t think of him as being as old as he was. He always seems to energetic and virile. I’m going to go out on a limb, though, and say he won’t be coming out of retirement, unless it’s for a cameo here and there. (Maybe Ocean’s 14? Heh?)
Here are some of Gene’s best:
Bonnie and Clyde (1967). You may recall this as a Warren Beatty/Faye Dunaway movie, but Hackman is in fine early form as Clyde’s brother Buck.
The French Connection (1971). One of the best cop movies ever stars Hackman as Popeye Doyle trying to stop a drug-smuggling ring (why don’t they call it “druggling”?). Features one of the best chase scenes on film, too.
The Poseidon Adventure (1972). As the unorthodox priest Frank Scott, Hackman looks like he’s having a great time. You know, except for the ship being upside down and all.
The Conversation (1974). One of the most underrated – and perhaps the best – films of the seventies. Hackman is Harry Caul, a surveillance expert who gets a little too involved in a subject.
Night Moves (1975). Here, he’s private eye Harry Moseby, hired to track down the missing daughter of a fading actress. Melanie Griffith plays the daughter. Great mystery.
Superman (1978). Have you heard of this one? Yeah, this was before that Routh guy. Hackman plays Baldy McBalderton, aka Lex Luthor.
Under Fire (1983). Hackman’s a journalist in war-torn Nicaragua in ’79. Scary and very riveting.
Hoosiers (1986). Dennis Hopper’s comeback role as an alky b-ball junkie, but it’s Hackman as coach Norman Dale who’s the real show here. Inspiring, even if you don’t care for college hoops.
Mississippi Burning (1988). Hackman’s an FBI agent who investigates the murders of three black civil-rights activists, along with fellow agent Willem Dafoe. Dafoe’s the straight-arrow dude, and again Hackman is the offbeat partner.
Unforgiven (1992). Clint Eastwood’s great, great western features Hackman as the bad guy, Little Bill Daggett, who runs the town of Big Whiskey. It’s an arresting, poetic film about the ethical ambiguity of the old West. First in a slew of westerns for Hackman.
The Firm (1993). First of several John Grisham adaptations for Hackman. He might be the bad guy, I can’t remember now.
Crimson Tide (1995). Hackman is Captain Ramsey of the nuke sub Alabama alongside Denzel Washington as his XO. Tensions mount. It’s basically The Caine Mutiny.
The Royal Tenenbaums (2001). Hackman’s the titular head of this weird family, which includes Anjelica Huston, Luke and Owen Wilson, Gwyneth Paltrow, and even Danny Glover.
It’s okay to fan us, unless you really hate movies.
Posted by frothy in Housekeeping on January 29, 2010
If you don’t care for movies, then I recommend you don’t become a fan of our site on Facebook. You won’t like it if you do. It’ll be boring. It won’t even be snarkable. It’ll just annoy you, but not to the point of commenting on anything.
Now, as for the rest of you…. you should fan the site.
Every 80s movie will be remade in 3D: Gremlins
Posted by frothy in News/Rumors on January 25, 2010
According to unnamed super-duper secret sources, Gremlins will be remade soon. Yippee, you might say. It’ll be in 3D. You know, like the new Ghostbusters and virtually every other remake on the schedule.
http://marketsaw.blogspot.com/2010/01/exclusive-gremlins-will-rise-again-in.html
510 – Moon (***)
A lonely astronaut, nearing the end of a three-year hitch on the Moon harvesting helium, begins to hallucinate. And then things get weird. Duncan Jones’ thoughtful sci-fi is exceedingly well done, with a truly terrific performance by Sam Rockwell. It’ll seem a little murky and perhaps too esoteric for those who prefer explosions in space (there are none in this film), and it’s not a particularly fast-movie film, but it’s ultimately a joy to watch.
Sam Bell (Rockwell) works for the Lunar Corporation, a conglomerate that harvests helium from the crust of Earth’s moon for use on Earth as an energy source. Sam’s been stuck on the Moon for nearly three years, and he’s getting a little antsy – all he has for companionship (aside from TV reruns) is the base’s computer, GERTY (voiced by Kevin Spacey). He has human names for each of the harvesters and other equipment, but there isn’t much in terms of external stimuli to keep him occupied. And then one day, while examining the harvesters, Sam has what we might call an out-of-body experience, if we were feeling particularly punny that day. And suddenly those remaining couple of weeks don’t seem so uneventul – or lonely – after all.
I’m reminded of a line from 2010, paraphrased, “You see, something’s going to happen. Something wonderful.” The speaker there couldn’t tell Heywood Floyd what was going to happen, just as I certainly can’t tell you what’s happened to our man Sam or what it means for his mission.
In most thinky sci-fi movies, there comes a time when the protagonists figure out what’s going on, and then they spend the rest of the film trying to do something or other before they run out of time. It takes Sam a long time to accept the information he’s just learned, all physical evidence to the contrary, and by the time he understands what can be done he’s become so weakened that he can’t think straight. And that sort of adds to the veil of intrigue, too; is Sam hallucinating, or is what he knows to be real actually real? In fact, the movie really tries to get us to question what’s real and what’s not real. Is something real because of how it makes us feel? What if you found out this very second that essentially nothing you thought was real has any grounding in reality? Bet you’d feel pretty stunned and bummed.
More kudos: Rockwell is so amazing in such a challenging role, showing range so far flung that you’d almost think it wasn’t the same actor. Sort of like Bruce Dern in Silent Running or Gary Lockwood in the progenitor for these close-in, nonactiony space movies, 2001. His performance is so nuanced and so elegant that he should get awards recognition, but in these times of overmarketing and promotion, it’s not likely that an independent film would be so recognized. Also loved the passionate, majestic score by Clint Mansell. Very much reminiscent of John Williams’ legendary scores, full of pomp and import.
I think people who love mysteries and people who love movies set in the vast emptiness of space will really like this movie. It’s a lot of fun to watch. Rockwell, who’s been good in many things, is pitch perfect here, and the story is compelling stuff, too.
Moon: ***
509 – Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (***)
Posted by frothy in Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs on January 19, 2010
2009 was quite a banner year for animation, what with Coraline, Fantastic Mr. Fox, Where the Wild Things Are, and others pushing the bounds of technical wizardry. Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs is a little more on the down-low and is exactly the sort of movie you want your kids to see, and the kind that you’ll enjoy right along with them. It’s got a roller-coaster pace to it, though, which probably seems even more vertigo inducing in 3D.
Flint Lockwood (Bill Hader) is a creative genius whose inventions never seem to work out. He lives on isolated Swallow Island, where the primary item of trade is sardines. Eventually, though, the town can no longer export their beloved sardines, so the townspeople are stuck eating the slimy little things in lieu of actual food. Enter Flint, who’s spent his entire life being looked down upon by the denizens of Swallow; he creates a machine that creates food out of water, and when it inadvertently winds up in the lower atmosphere, voila! The food rains three times a day, everything from ice cream to hamburgers, pancakes, and steak. You can see how this would pose a problem down the road. People get fat, and the machine becomes overtaxed.
Can Flint save the day? Thanks to some wonderful animation, you won’t care that you already know the answer. This is one of those rare movies that sustains the bouncy whimsy of a children’s book. Flint is brainy and awkward and impetuous and, above all, hilarious, thanks to the jaunty voice given to him by Hader. And oh yes, he does have a love interest, Sam Sparks (Anna Faris), a newbie weather reporter who’s stuck on the island when the food begins to fall; when Sam lets her inner geek shine, look out. Flint’s only friend is a monkey (Neil Patrick Harris) who’s been outfitted with a monkey-speech translator, and the mayor (Bruce Campbell) is a pompous know-it-all. Oh, and his dad (James Caan) is a tackle-shop owner who really wishes his son would join the family business.
Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs probably won’t bowl you over with amazing effects, but it’s got a tremendous heart and is honestly funny and touching. The voice roles, particularly Hader, are also very well cast. And Mr. T’s in it! No, seriously, Mr. T! Playing a cop!
Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs: ***
508 – The Book of Eli (***)
Posted by frothy in Book of Eli on January 16, 2010
In a grimy, washed out, post-war world, one man steadfastly marches west to fulfill a vision. The rogue Eli vows to protect his holy book at all costs, whether against curious onlookers or roving gangs, and to never stray from his path of righteousness, both literally and figuratively. The Book of Eli is a seriously badass film, with Denzel Washington offering just the right amount of panache and stoicism in a role you’d ordinarily expect to see played by Bruce Willis or Will Smith.
Eli (Washington) is a relic from long ago, before the wars robbed the world of its people. He remembers when the blinding flashes of light came and the beginning of the nuclear winter that soon followed. He has little in life: a machete, a couple of guns, a bow and arrow, an iPod, and a book. Although the book is never explicitly named in the movie, it’s a King James Bible, and the religious overtones aren’t even a little bit subtle. Eli, whether he seems himself like this or not, is a prophet chosen to bring the good word to the western shores, through a barren wasteland in which people are scared and aimless and whose lives lack spirituality.
As his arsenal might indicate, Eli is by no means a pushover. He has catlike reflexes and is an excellent marksman. The man can handle himself in a fight. He looks a little weathered (there are a few references to his age), but he seems to be in tremendous mental and physical shape. He is so resolute in his single-minded journey that he doesn’t even stop to lend a hand when a gang of toughs attacks a man and a woman pushing a wheelbarrow. Eli pushes on toward the town, not wishing to stray. (Naturally, he’ll meet up with those same toughs just minutes later.)
Every hero must have some kind of villain, and for Eli it’s Carnegie (Gary Oldman), who rules the local town with an iron fist. Carnegie’s quest is to find a Bible, because he realizes – even as a small-time despot – that if he can get people to follow the teachings of the Good Book, he’ll really be able to own them; he sends out marauding gangs to look for one, because after the wars every known Bible was burned. To maintain his hold and even expand to other towns, Carnegie must have that book.
At the town, Eli is joined by Solara (Mila Kunis), the daughter of Carnegie’s woman (played by Jennifer Beals), who’s also blind. Solara wants to escape her one-way, dead-end, two-bit town, but the man with the machete works alone. He’s like Dirty Harry, or something.
The movie is not without its faults, however. Carnegie’s intentions seem ambiguous, even unnecessary. Also, it’s not clear whether we’re meant to think Eli is a man on a mission or is actually protected by some greater power. That is to say, it’s obvious that Eli himself believes the latter, but whether this is actually true within the film’s own parameters is a little murkier.
Then there’s the inclusion of Solara herself; it’s almost as if she’s there as a pretty face to offset all the dreary, dust-spattered machismo floating about. Give the film a softer edge. But it’s a serious character who has quite a bit to do with how Eli spends the rest of his journey, and Kunis isn’t up to the task; she’s far, far too lightweight an actress for such an emotionally demanding role, and the movie suffers as a result.
Finally, the twist that comes right at the very end of the movie is a little… odd. You might not see it coming, and you might even rub your eyes a few times to figure out if what you saw is what you thought you saw. To me, the twist just plain didn’t matter. I have read elsewhere that this twist is crucial to the movie, but I don’t agree; it just felt out of place. This twist is meant to explain the preceding two hours away. It’s supposed to make you slap your forehead with realization. But the way I see it, if you buy into this twist, fine; if you don’t buy into it, you still have a good movie that delivers what it promises: a lot of ass kicking in a post-apocalyptic world of the near future.
Book of Eli: ***
Something strange in Ivan Reitman’s neighborhood; He-Man sought
Posted by frothy in News/Rumors on January 15, 2010
Ivan Reitman on board to direct Ghostbusters 3.
Some of you folks might remember a little movie called Ghostbusters, which was awesome, and its oddly named sequel, which was not. The same guy directed and produced them both, and he’s now been tapped to do it a third time.
This might be good news if
1) Ivan Reitman was no longer the best director in the family (son Jason did Up in the Air and Juno)
2) the original cast showed up for more than a cameo
3) this wasn’t going to be a reboot of the series
Ivan Reitman is now 98 years old. He might be too old to direct a movie that’ll be aimed toward twentysomethings.
507 – 9 (**1/2)
9 is the story about a burlap doll (voiced by Elijah Wood) who awakens to a postapocalyptic world in which humans have exterminated themselves. He comes across a few others like him, such as the cowardly leader 1 (Christopher Plummer) and the benevolent 2 (Martin Landau) and accidentally awakens a metallic beast out to destroy them all. 9 is definitely solid entertainment and is visually arresting, but sometimes it’s a little hard to follow – a little too visually arresting, if that’s possible.
There’s been a recent surge in movies that use alternative methods of animation, and it’s a positive trend. Back in 1993, when Henry Selick and Tim Burton got together and did The Nightmare before Christmas, stop-motion animation was seen as a coming Big Thing. But it wasn’t this past year that we began to see so many movies animated in nontraditional ways, like Fantastic Mr. Fox, Coraline (Selick again), and Where the Wild Things Are.
If nothing else, 9 is really, really fascinating to look at. When I say these are burlap dolls, that’s essentially all they are, with robotic arms and camera eyes and some sentience. They’re also miniature, like action-figure size, so seeing them tiptoe through the desperate wasteland of postapocalyptic Earth is a bit unnerving, to say the least.
This really isn’t a movie for kids. Like Coraline, 9 is pretty dark, visually if not in tone. Point of fact: the tone is about as downbeat as a typical Disney film, but because it’s set against a backdrop of such desolation and emptiness, it seems much worse than it is. That said, there are some scenes that would probably give the younger set nightmares for weeks (such as the giant machine spewing fire and bullets at the burlap dolls).
Wood is ideally cast as the reluctant, somewhat-naive 9, who (of course) winds up leading the rest of the motley crew, which includes the mute twins 3 and 4, the one-eyed engineer 5 (John C. Reilly), the reclusive 6 (Crispin Glover), the daring 7 (Jennifer Connelly), and the muscular 8 (Fred Tatasciore), to save themselves – if not the human race.
The movie takes place along an alternate timeline, with thinly veiled references to Nazi Germany. (As in, this is what might have happened had the bad guys won.) It’s creepy to watch, but utterly mesmerizing as well. There are some nods to the legendary 1922 sci-fi thriller Metropolis (man versus machine), and there’s a certain steampunk vibe as well.
My bottom line is that one can certainly appreciate the grand effort it must have taken to make this film, with some eye-popping visual effects and genuinely chilling moments. The script is a little weak and predictable, so it’s no Toy Story; the cleverness is in the details, such as the zipper in 9′s body, the camera lenses in their eyes, and so on, and less so in the dialogue or plot development.
9: **1/2
506 – The Lovely Bones (**)
Posted by frothy in Lovely Bones on January 12, 2010
A murdered teenager watches from Heaven as her family tries to deal with the reality and consequences of her death. Not really meant to be an uplifting movie anyway, this adaptation of an Alice Sebold novel is almost relentlessly depressing, overbearing, maudlin, and dull. It’s a movie that demands considerable emotional investment, but it takes too long to reach its conclusion, leaving you cold when you should be concerned.
The movie opens shortly before Susie Salmon (Saoirse Ronan) is killed by a creepy neighbor (Stanley Tucci) in 1973 and then finds her stuck in limbo while her family deals with the tragedy. She is also keeping an eye on Mr. Harvey, her killer, in the hopes that someone will catch him and find her body. But just so you’re aware, this is not a murder mystery, since we know almost immediately who the killer is; it’s a melodrama about how people cope with loss.
So there’s very little intrigue to be found, and every little plot development seems to exist merely to move things along to some undefined conclusion with which you may or may not agree. Dad Jack (Mark Wahlberg) copes by lashing out (at items he built with his daughter, not at his family); mom Abigail (Rachel Weisz) opts for escape; sister Lindsey (Rose McIver) escapes as well, out of Susie’s shadow. Even Abigail’s mother, Grandma Lynn (Susan Sarandon) shows up to lend a hand to a family reeling – the fact that she’s a chain-smoking, liquor-swilling wild woman gives everyone a jolt, but it’s just not enough.
Critics have said that Sebold’s novel is probably unfilmable, and they’re right. Director Peter Jackson uses some startling visual imagery, but it’s really nothing noteworthy (and, truth be told, What Dreams May Come, which covered some of the same subject matter, was far more visually interesting); worse, everything feels jammed in, a square peg desperately trying to fit into a round hole.
But worse than that, for me, was the interminable, uncomfortable scene in which Susie is abducted by Mr. Harvey. There seemed to be no good reason to drag this interaction out as much as Jackson did, other than to make everyone squeamish. Since the thrust of the movie was the Salmon family’s reaction – and Susie’s experiences in the afterlife – showing us a drawn-out attack scene felt gratuitous and had me eyeing the exit signs.
As for the cast, Wahlberg and Weisz try their best but are overshadowed by the constant shots of Ronan attempting to convey an emotion of some sort. Ronan, who was terrible in Atonement and mildly improved in City of Ember, is given little to do other than look pitiful. Sarandon chews scenery as a vamping lush of a grandma. The only one who shines is Tucci, who’s almost unrecognizable as the bespectacled blonde killer.
Peter Jackson’s The Lovely Bones is stylish but insubstantial. While the effects are fun to look at and feel full of meaning and import, the story and acting feel almost tacked on as an afterthought. This is problematic when the movie relies heavily on the story to begin with, because it makes the low-key character-driven scenes look even worse in comparison.
The Lovely Bones: **
There will be no Spider-Man 4; series to reboot instead
Posted by frothy in News/Rumors on January 12, 2010
Sam Raimi, who has directed the three big-screen Spideys so far, has told Sony that he won’t be able to get the picture done in time for its summer release without sacrificing quality. (Meaning that he could crank out a crappy Spider-Man 4, if that’s what they wanted. Hey, it’s what they GOT with Spider-Man 3.)
So that means that Raimi is out, as are Tobey Maguire and the rest of the cast. The latest buzz has the franchise getting a reboot, with the next movie taking place during Peter Parker’s time in high school. No word yet on a director, and we’re talking at least a 2011 release, so there’s oodles of time.
Avatar = Pocahontas? Well, yeah…
I can’t take credit for the following, but I’m not sure where it originated. (I got it from Failblog.)
![]()
see more Epic Fails






People Had This to Say